Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 21, 2026

Rapid Molecular Detection and Differentiation of Influenza Viruses A and B
Published on: January 30, 2017
Rapid influenza test in young febrile infants for the identification of low-risk patients
Santiago Mintegi1, Juan José Garcia-Garcia, Javier Benito
1Paediatric Emergency Department, Hospital Cruces, Barakaldo, Basque Country, Spain. santiago.mintegi@osakidetza.net
Insights
Rapid influenza tests (RIT) can identify febrile infants at lower risk for serious bacterial infections. A positive RIT in infants suggests routine blood cultures may not be necessary, improving emergency department efficiency.
Area of Science:
- Pediatrics
- Infectious Diseases
- Clinical Diagnostics
Background:
- Febrile infants under 3 months present a diagnostic challenge.
- Distinguishing viral from bacterial infections is crucial for appropriate management.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the utility of rapid influenza testing (RIT) in febrile infants.
- To determine if RIT can help identify infants with a lower risk of serious bacterial infections (SBIs).
Main Methods:
- Retrospective study of 381 febrile infants (<3 months) with blood cultures and RIT.
- Comparison of SBI prevalence between positive and negative RIT groups.
Main Results:
- Significantly lower SBI prevalence in the positive RIT group (2.65%) vs. negative RIT group (17.5%).
- No positive blood cultures in the positive RIT group; 8 positive blood cultures in the negative RIT group.
- All 5 positive cerebrospinal fluid cultures were in the negative RIT group.
Conclusions:
- RIT can identify febrile infants at lower risk for SBIs during influenza season.
- Routine blood cultures may be unnecessary for infants with a positive RIT.
Abstract:
We included 381 febrile infants less than 3 months with a blood culture and a rapid influenza test done as part of study of fever. The prevalence of serious bacterial infections was significantly lower in patients in the positive rapid influenza test (RIT) group (3/113; 2.65%; 95% CI: 0-5.6) than in patients in the negative RIT group (47/268; 17.5%; 95% CI: 13-22.0). No patient with a positive RIT had a positive blood culture (vs. 8 in the negative RIT group, 2.98%, 95% CI: 0.9-5.0) The cerebrospinal fluid culture was positive in 5; all of them had a negative RIT. The use of RIT in the Emergency Department on previously well-appearing febrile young infants without a known source during influenza seasons can help to identify infants with a lower risk of developing serious bacterial infections. Routine blood culture may be no longer necessary in infants with a positive RIT.
Related Concept Videos
Respiratory Syncytial Virus Disease
Influenza

