Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 21, 2026

Multimodal Approach to Assess Bone Regeneration and Scaffold Performance
Published on: February 13, 2026
Effect of ridge morphology on guided bone regeneration outcome: conventional tomographic study
Sang-Hoon Park1, Sharon L Brooks, Tae-Ju Oh
1Department of Periodontics, Dental School, Baltimore College of Dental Surgery, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, USA. spark@umaryland.edu
Background:
This study retrospectively analyzed conventional tomograms to estimate the prognostic value of the cross-sectional ridge morphology on the clinical outcome of guided bone regeneration (GBR).
Methods:
Presurgical conventional tomograms of 23 single-implant sites were analyzed retrospectively in 20 patients. All sites had a non-space-making buccal dehiscence defect associated with the subsequently placed dental implant. Simultaneous GBR procedures were performed, and 6-month clinical outcomes were assessed. Measurements at baseline and at the 6-month reentry included defect height (from smooth-rough junction to the most apical part of the defect) and horizontal bone gain at three locations (smooth-rough junction, middle, and most apical portion of the defect). All measurements were taken from a reference template. Tomographic parameters included the implant-associated ridge angle and width measured at 6 mm below the alveolar crest and at the most apical point of the implant. Implant exposure and the presence of the barrier membrane were controlled for during statistical analyses.
Results:
The presurgical ridge angle had a significant negative correlation with the percentage of defect height reduction (r = -0.621; P = 0.002) and horizontal bone gain (r = -0.469; P = 0.024). This difference remained significant even after controlling for implant/membrane exposure (P = 0.001 and P = 0.019, respectively). A statistically and clinically greater percentage of defect height reduction was observed for ridge angles <28 degrees (P = 0.023). Ridge width did not have a significant effect on the regenerative outcome.
Conclusion:
Cross-sectional presurgical ridge angles may have prognostic value in estimating the outcome of simultaneous GBR.
