Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 21, 2026

Fully Endoscopic Mitral Valve Repair with Percutaneous Cannulation of Groin Vessels
Published on: May 26, 2023
Long-term outcomes of percutaneous mitral balloon valvuloplasty versus open cardiac surgery
Jae-Kwan Song1, Mi-Jeong Kim, Sung-Cheol Yun
1Division of Cardiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea. jksong@amc.seoul.kr
Insights
Open heart surgery demonstrated superior long-term event-free survival compared to percutaneous mitral valvuloplasty. Patients with severe mitral valve disease or atrial fibrillation particularly benefited from open heart surgery.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Cardiac Surgery
- Interventional Cardiology
Background:
- Mitral valve disease is a significant cardiovascular condition.
- Percutaneous mitral valvuloplasty (PMV) and open heart surgery (OHS) are primary treatment options.
- Long-term comparative outcomes between PMV and OHS require further investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the long-term clinical outcomes of PMV versus OHS for mitral valve disease.
- To identify patient subgroups that may benefit more from one procedure over the other.
Main Methods:
- A cohort study evaluated 402 patients undergoing PMV and 159 patients undergoing OHS (1995-2000).
- The primary endpoint was a composite of cardiovascular death or repeat intervention.
- Outcomes were analyzed using Cox proportional hazards models, adjusting for baseline illness severity, echocardiographic scores, and cardiac rhythm.
Main Results:
- Unadjusted event-free survival was similar between PMV and OHS groups.
- Adjusted analysis revealed significantly higher event-free survival after OHS (adjusted hazard ratio: 3.729, P < .0001).
- Patients with high echocardiographic scores (≥8) or atrial fibrillation showed substantially better outcomes with OHS (adjusted hazard ratios: 5.348 and 3.440, respectively).
Conclusions:
- Open heart surgery is associated with superior long-term event-free survival compared to percutaneous mitral valvuloplasty.
- OHS offers better long-term outcomes for patients with significant echocardiographic abnormalities or atrial fibrillation.
- Patient selection based on disease severity and comorbidities is crucial for optimizing mitral valve intervention outcomes.
Objectives:
We sought to compare long-term outcomes between percutaneous mitral valvuloplasty and open heart surgery.
Methods:
The study evaluated 402 patients who underwent percutaneous mitral valvuloplasty and 159 patients who underwent open heart surgery between January 1, 1995, and December 31, 2000. The rates of cardiovascular death or repeated intervention (redo percutaneous mitral valvuloplasty or open heart surgery) were determined over a median follow-up of 109 months (mean + or - SD, 106 + or - 27). The therapeutic effects on adverse outcomes were estimated by the Cox proportional hazards model adjusting differences in the severity of illness before intervention. The effects of the cardiac rhythm and echocardiographic score were also tested.
Results:
The observed (unadjusted) event-free survival was similar for both groups, and the hazard ratio for the clinical events after percutaneous mitral valvuloplasty as compared with after open heart surgery was 1.510 (95% confidence interval, 0.914-2.496; P = .1079). However, the adjusted hazard ratio was 3.729 (95% confidence interval, 1.963-7.082; P < .0001), showing a higher event-free survival in the open heart surgery group. The adjusted hazard ratio after percutaneous mitral valvuloplasty as compared with after open heart surgery in patients with echocardiographic scores of 8 or more and atrial fibrillation were 5.348 (95% confidence interval, 2.504-11.422; P < .001) and 3.440 (95% confidence interval, 1.805-6.555; P = .0002), respectively, whereas the hazard ratio in patients with echocardiographic scores less than 8 and normal sinus rhythm did not show differences.
Conclusions:
Open heart surgery was associated with a higher adjusted rate of long-term event-free survival than percutaneous mitral valvuloplasty. Patients with high echocardiographic scores or atrial fibrillation showed better outcomes after open heart surgery.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Mitral Stenosis III: Medical Management
Mitral Valve Prolapse II: Assessment and Management
Mitral Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Mitral Stenosis IV: Nursing Management
Mitral Stenosis II: Clinical features and Diagnostic Tests
Mitral Valve Prolapse III: Nursing Management

