Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 20, 2026

Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases
Published on: October 24, 2019
The impact of boundary spanning scholarly publications and patents
Xiaolin Shi1, Lada A Adamic, Belle L Tseng
1Department of EECS, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA. shixl@umich.edu
Background:
Human knowledge and innovation are recorded in two media: scholarly publication and patents. These records not only document a new scientific insight or new method developed, but they also carefully cite prior work upon which the innovation is built.
Methodology:
We quantify the impact of information flow across fields using two large citation dataset: one spanning over a century of scholarly work in the natural sciences, social sciences and humanities, and second spanning a quarter century of United States patents.
Conclusions:
We find that a publication's citing across disciplines is tied to its subsequent impact. In the case of patents and natural science publications, those that are cited at least once are cited slightly more when they draw on research outside of their area. In contrast, in the social sciences, citing within one's own field tends to be positively correlated with impact.
Related Concept Videos
Crossing Over
The homologous pairs of sister chromosomes—one from the maternal and one from the paternal genome—then begin to align alongside each other lengthwise, matching corresponding DNA positions in a process called synapsis.
In order to...
Diffusion
Gap Junctions
Mutation, Gene Flow, and Genetic Drift
Distribution and Dispersion
Binary Fission