Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Decision Making

Decision Making

Decision-making is a fundamental cognitive process that involves evaluating alternatives and selecting among them. This process can range from simple choices, such as deciding what to wear, to complex decisions, like choosing a major in college or a career path. The complexity of the decision often dictates the approach we use, which can be broadly categorized into two types: automatic and controlled decision-making.
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...

Decision Making: Traditional Method

Decision Making: Traditional Method

The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...

Decision Making: P-value Method

Decision Making: P-value Method

The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can have a...

Reason and Intuition

Reason and Intuition

The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the brain can only use...

Design Example: Analyzing Capacity Contours for Flood Risk Assessment

Design Example: Analyzing Capacity Contours for Flood Risk Assessment

Flood risk assessment involves careful planning and analysis to ensure the safety of communities near water retention structures. Capacity contours are a vital tool in this process, as they illustrate the potential spread of water at specific levels in a given area. In the context of building a bund across a small valley, these contours play a critical role in evaluating the safety of nearby residential areas.In this example, the bund is intended to store stormwater in the valley. The engineers...

Conservation of Declining Populations

Conservation of Declining Populations

Conservation of declining population focuses on ways of detecting, diagnosing, and halting a population decline. The approach uses methods to prevent populations from going extinct.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Adaptive multi-model ensembles for improved epidemic projections and decision support.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2026

Same author

Impact of Wearing a Face Mask on the Reliability of Standard Automated Perimetry in Glaucoma Patients and Suspects: a Retrospective Longitudinal Study.

Klinische Monatsblatter fur Augenheilkunde·2026

Same author

Fragmentation as a population rate-changer: A field experiment.

Ecology·2026

Same author

Changes in phenology mediate vertebrate population responses to temperature globally.

Nature communications·2026

Same author

Using Deep Learning to Automate Orangutan Nest Detections on Aerial Images Collected With Drones.

American journal of primatology·2025

Same author

An expert elicitation to inform coastal management decision-making for mitigating future hazards.

Journal of environmental management·2025

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 20, 2026

Watershed Planning within a Quantitative Scenario Analysis Framework

Watershed Planning within a Quantitative Scenario Analysis Framework

Published on: July 24, 2016

Structured decision making as a conceptual framework to identify thresholds for conservation and management.

Julien Martin¹, Michael C Runge, James D Nichols

¹Florida Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611-0485, USA. julienm@ufl.edu

Ecological Applications : a Publication of the Ecological Society of America

|August 20, 2009

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

A new framework clarifies ecological thresholds for conservation decision-making. It distinguishes ecological, utility, and decision thresholds for transparent, objective management actions.

More Related Videos

Spatial Multiobjective Optimization of Agricultural Conservation Practices using a SWAT Model and an Evolutionary Algorithm

Spatial Multiobjective Optimization of Agricultural Conservation Practices using a SWAT Model and an Evolutionary Algorithm

Published on: December 9, 2012

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 20, 2026

Watershed Planning within a Quantitative Scenario Analysis Framework

Watershed Planning within a Quantitative Scenario Analysis Framework

Published on: July 24, 2016

Spatial Multiobjective Optimization of Agricultural Conservation Practices using a SWAT Model and an Evolutionary Algorithm

Spatial Multiobjective Optimization of Agricultural Conservation Practices using a SWAT Model and an Evolutionary Algorithm

Published on: December 9, 2012

Area of Science:

Ecology
Conservation Biology
Decision Science

Background:

Thresholds are crucial in ecological literature but lack a clear framework for conservation.
This ambiguity hinders effective application of threshold concepts in conservation decision-making.

Purpose of the Study:

To propose a structured decision-making framework for understanding and applying ecological thresholds in conservation.
To promote logical, transparent, and informed conservation decisions.

Main Methods:

Distinguishing three types of thresholds: ecological, utility, and decision thresholds.
Integrating these thresholds into a structured decision process focused on management objectives.
Using system models and state variables to define decision thresholds and optimize management actions.

Main Results:

The framework clearly separates subjective (objectives, actions) from objective (models, states) components of decision-making.
Decision matrices are generated, specifying optimal actions based on system state variables and defined thresholds.
Numerical examples using patch occupancy models illustrate the application of the framework with all three threshold types.

Conclusions:

The proposed framework provides a clear, structured approach to conservation decision-making involving ecological thresholds.
It facilitates optimal decision-making by integrating ecological dynamics, human values, and management objectives.
Adaptive management can be employed to handle dynamic decision thresholds in conservation planning.