Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 20, 2026
Lumican Extraction from Amniotic Membrane and Determination of its Storage Temperature
Published on: October 14, 2022
Comparison of cryopreserved and air-dried human amniotic membrane for ophthalmologic applications
Henning Thomasen1, Mikk Pauklin, Klaus-Peter Steuhl
1Department of Ophthalmology, University of Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstrasse 55, 45122 Essen, Germany.
Background:
Cryopreserved amniotic membrane (Cryo-AM) is widely used in ocular surface surgery because of its positive effect on wound healing and its anti-inflammatory properties. A new peracetic acid/ethanol sterilized air-dried amniotic membrane (AD-AM) recently became available which might be an alternative to Cryo-AM. Our aim was to compare AM preserved with both methods with regard to the release of wound-healing modulating proteins, the preservation of basement membrane components, and the ability to serve as a substrate for the cultivation of human limbal epithelial cells (HLECs).
Methods:
Pieces of Cryo-AM and AD-AM from three different donors were incubated in DMEM for five days. The culture supernatant was collected after an incubation period of 0.1, 24, 48, 72 and 120 h; in the case of AD-AM, this period was extended up to 14 days. TIMP-1, IL-1ra, CTGF and TGF-beta1 were detected in the culture supernatant using Western blotting. Twenty human limbal epithelial cultures were initiated on both AD- and Cryo-AM. The cultures were analyzed morphologically, and the outgrowth area was measured in 3-day intervals. Cryosections of Cryo- and AD-AM from three different donors were analyzed histochemically to detect the basement membrane components collagen IV, collagen VII, laminin, laminin 5 and fibronectin.
Results:
The release of TIMP-1, IL-1ra and TGF-beta1 from Cryo-AM was constant for the studied period. CTGF showed a stronger signal after 120 h. None of the analyzed proteins, except for a small amount of IL-1ra, could be detected in the supernatant of AD-AM. An outgrowth of HLEC was observed in all cultures on Cryo-AM, but in only 30% of cultures on AD-AM. The outgrowth area on Cryo-AM was at all time points significantly higher than on AD-AM (p < 0.0001). Collagen IV, -VII, laminins and fibronectin were detectable in the basement membrane of Cryo-AM, but only collagen IV and fibronectin in AD-AM.
Conclusions:
Cryo-AM is a more suitable substrate for the cultivation of HLECs than AD-AM. The higher outgrowth rate of cultured limbal epithelium, release of intact soluble wound-healing modulating factors and a better preservation of basement membrane components suggest the superiority of Cryo-AM for use in ophthalmology in comparison to AD-AM.
