Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 4, 2026

Author Spotlight: High-Throughput Measurement of Intracellular ROS Levels in Hepatocellular Lines
Published on: January 19, 2024
Induced expression of drug metabolizing enzymes by preventive agents: role of the antioxidant response element
Ronald A Lubet1, Ruisheng Yao, Clinton J Grubbs
1Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, Executive Plaza North, Suite 2110, 6130 Executive Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20852, USA. lubetr@mail.nih.gov
Abstract:
Identifying agents that block tumor initiation is a goal of cancer prevention. The ability of a chemically varied group of agents to induce various drug metabolizing genes in livers of rats was examined. Sprague-Dawley rats were treated for 7 days with various agents in the diet or by gavage. The agents examined, which might be expected to respond via specific nuclear receptors (CAR, AhR) as well as antioxidant response elements (AREs), included Phase I/II inducers [5,6-benzoflavone (BF, 5000mg/kg diet), diallyl sulfide (DAS, 500mg/kg BW/day), ethoxyquin (EXO, 300mg/kg BW/day) and phenobarbital (PB, 500mg/kg diet)] or pure Phase II inducers [1,2-dithiol-3-thione (DTT, 500mg/kg diet), and cyclopentadithiolthione (CPDTT, 175mg/kg BW/day)]. Liver RNA expression was analyzed employing oligonucleotide microarrays. The agents yielded unique expression profiles. In genes with known AREs, the induction ratios (Levels Treated/Levels Controls) were: quinone oxidoreductase (BF, 8:1; DTT, 3.2:1; CPDTT, 3:1; DAS, 1.8:1; Exo, 1.7:1), glutatione transferase Pi (DTT, 36:1; CPDTT, 34:1; EXO, 8:1; DAS, 5:1; BF, 2.5:1), and aldehyde keto reductase 7A3 (AFAR) (DTT and CPDTT, 14:1; DAS, 6:1; EXO, 4:1; PB, 1.5:1). When the search included a wider variety of Phase II drug metabolizing enzymes, no clear pattern was observed. Agent induced gene expression and preventive activity in published carcinogen induced tumor models showed limited correlation; questioning whether measuring the induction of one or two genes (e.g., quinone reductase) is a surrogate for overall Phase II inducing (antioxidant) and potential anti-tumor activity.
Insights
Identifying cancer prevention agents is crucial. This study examined how various compounds affect drug-metabolizing genes in rats, finding limited correlation between gene induction and anti-tumor activity, questioning simple gene markers for prevention efficacy.
Area of Science:
- Biochemistry
- Molecular Biology
- Toxicology
Background:
- Cancer prevention strategies aim to identify agents that inhibit tumor initiation.
- Drug-metabolizing enzymes play a role in detoxification and cancer prevention.
- Understanding how different agents induce these enzymes is key to evaluating their potential.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the ability of chemically diverse agents to induce drug metabolizing genes in rat livers.
- To examine the correlation between agent-induced gene expression and their known preventive activity in tumor models.
- To question the validity of using single gene induction as a surrogate marker for overall anti-tumor efficacy.
Main Methods:
- Sprague-Dawley rats were treated for 7 days with various Phase I/II or pure Phase II inducers.
- Agents included 5,6-benzoflavone, diallyl sulfide, ethoxyquin, phenobarbital, 1,2-dithiol-3-thione, and cyclopentadithiolthione.
- Liver RNA expression was analyzed using oligonucleotide microarrays.
Main Results:
- Different agents produced unique gene expression profiles.
- Specific induction ratios were observed for quinone oxidoreductase, glutathione transferase Pi, and aldehyde keto reductase 7A3.
- A broader analysis of Phase II enzymes revealed no clear induction pattern.
- Limited correlation was found between agent-induced gene expression and published tumor prevention data.
Conclusions:
- The induction profiles of drug-metabolizing genes vary significantly among different chemical agents.
- Measuring the induction of a single gene, like quinone reductase, may not accurately reflect overall Phase II enzyme induction or anti-tumor potential.
- Further research is needed to establish reliable biomarkers for cancer prevention agents.
More Related Videos
10:00Induction and Analysis of Oxidative Stress in Sleeping Beauty Transposon-Transfected Human Retinal Pigment Epithelial Cells
Published on: December 11, 2020
09:33Formation of Covalent DNA Adducts by Enzymatically Activated Carcinogens and Drugs In Vitro and Their Determination by 32P-postlabeling
Published on: March 20, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Drug Toxicity: Risk factors
Drug toxicity: Idiosyncratic Reactions
Pharmacogenetics of Drug Metabolism: Overview
Drug Metabolism: Phase I Reactions
Factors Affecting Drug Biotransformation: Physicochemical and Chemical Properties of Drugs
The drug's acidity or basicity is essential in...
Phase I Oxidative Reactions: Overview