Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 20, 2026

Shrinkage of Dental Composite in Simulated Cavity Measured with Digital Image Correlation
Published on: July 21, 2014
Setting characteristics and cavity adaptation of low-shrinking resin composites
Dimitris Papadogiannis1, Afrodite Kakaboura, George Palaghias
1Department of Biomaterials, School of Dentistry, University of Athens, Greece. deminho@gmail.com
Objectives:
The aim of this study was to evaluate the setting characteristics of low-shrinking resin composites and examine the possible interactions with curing efficiency and marginal adaptation in dentin cavities.
Methods:
The materials tested were Ceram X Mono/CM, Premise/PR, Clearfil Majesty/CM, ELS/EL, and Filtek Silorane/FS. Polymerization shrinkage strain (%S), strain rate (%S(r)) and time at maximum strain rate (t(max)) were measured using the bonded disk method. Curing efficiency was measured on the top and bottom surfaces of composites with ATR-FTIR spectroscopy. Marginal adaptation was measured in unbonded (%VVF) and bonded (%XVF) specimens by computerized X-ray microtomography (micro-XCT). The % linear length of the interfacial gaps along the cavity margins (%LD) and the maximum gap width (WD(max)) were calculated under optical microscopy on sectioned specimens. Statistical analysis was performed with one- and two-way ANOVA, Bonferroni's post hoc test and Pearson's correlation coefficient.
Results:
The %S values ranged from 1.34% (FS) to 2.29% (CX), while %S(r) ranged from 0.06%s(-1) (FS) to 0.15%s(-1) (CX). %VVF values extended from 1.9% (FS) to 5.3% (CX) and for %XVF from 1.98% (FS) to 3.35% (CX). The values for %LD ranged from 36.52% (FS) to 81.28% (CX). Linear regression showed strong positive correlation for %S(r) and t(max) with %VVF (r(2)=0.884 and r(2)=0.927) and also for %S(r) and t(max) with %LD (r(2)=0.823 and r(2)=0.869).
Significance:
%S(r) and t(max) are more representative than %S in determining the setting pattern of the materials and are strongly correlated to marginal adaptation. The silorane material showed better behavior than the dimethacrylate materials in setting shrinkage and marginal adaptation.
Related Concept Videos
Shrinkage in Concrete
When concrete is still in its plastic state, it can undergo a decrease in volume by about 1% of its absolute volume. This decrease is known as plastic shrinkage. It arises either...
Masonry Cavity Walls
Maintaining a clean cavity during construction is...
