Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 8, 2026

Shrinkage of Dental Composite in Simulated Cavity Measured with Digital Image Correlation
Published on: July 21, 2014
Comparative laboratory study of 3D printed denture base resin materials
Ioli Ioanna Artopoulou1, Eleftheria Pani2, George Eliades3
1Associate Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; and f. Fellow, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, University of Texas, Houston, TX.
Two 3D printed denture base resins were evaluated for mechanical and surface properties. While differences were observed, their clinical significance for removable dentures requires further investigation.
Area of Science:
- Biomaterials Science
- Dental Materials Science
- Polymer Science
Background:
- Emerging 3D printed denture base resins require property assessment.
- Limited data exists on the performance of novel 3D printed denture materials.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the degree of conversion, hardness, crosslinking density, tensile strength, surface roughness, and wettability of two 3D printed denture base materials against a heat-polymerized control.
- To evaluate VisiJet PXL and OptiPrint Laviva 3D printed materials versus a polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) control.
Main Methods:
- Specimens of two 3D printed resins (VisiJet PXL, OptiPrint Laviva) and a PMMA control were fabricated.
- Properties assessed included degree of conversion (Fourier Transform Infrared spectroscopy), Vickers hardness, crosslinking density, tensile strength (universal testing machine), surface roughness (optical profiler), and wettability (contact angle goniometry).
Main Results:
- The PMMA control showed a higher degree of conversion than VisiJet PXL.
- OptiPrint Laviva exhibited higher Vickers hardness than VisiJet PXL and PMMA.
- Tensile strength and elastic modulus were higher for VisiJet PXL and PMMA compared to OptiPrint Laviva.
- Surface roughness varied between materials, with OptiPrint Laviva showing lower values for some parameters.
- No significant differences in wettability were found among the materials.
Conclusions:
- The distinct chemical compositions of the 3D printed resins lead to significant variations in their mechanical and surface properties.
- Further research is needed to correlate these findings with clinical performance in removable dentures and maxillofacial prostheses.
More Related Videos
07:42Quasistatic Mechanical Testing for Computer-Aided Design and Manufacturing Occlusal Veneers Cemented to Milled Dentin Analog Material
Published on: December 20, 2024
03:02Impact of Fabrication Techniques and Polishing Procedures on Surface Roughness of Denture Base Resins
Published on: January 17, 2025