Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 20, 2026

09:08
Multiple-mouse Neuroanatomical Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Published on: February 27, 2011
Design and performance evaluation of a coplanar multimodality scanner for rodent imaging
E Lage1, J J Vaquero, A Sisniega
1Unidad de Medicina y Cirugía Experimental, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain. elage@mce.hggm.es
Physics in Medicine and Biology
|August 25, 2009
Summary
This study introduces the VrPET/CT, a novel, cost-effective small-animal imaging system. It offers excellent Positron Emission Tomography (PET) and Computed Tomography (CT) performance for in vivo rodent research.
Area of Science:
- Medical Imaging
- Biomedical Engineering
- Nuclear Medicine
Background:
- Developing advanced imaging systems is crucial for preclinical research.
- Existing small-animal PET/CT scanners can be expensive and complex.
- There is a need for cost-effective, high-performance imaging solutions for rodent studies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To report the development and performance evaluation of the VrPET/CT, a new multimodality scanner for in vivo rodent imaging.
- To assess the PET system's performance using the NEMA NU-4 protocol.
- To evaluate the accuracy of inter-modality alignment and the overall imaging capability of the VrPET/CT system.
Main Methods:
- The VrPET/CT features a partial-ring PET system and a small-animal CT on a coplanar rotatory gantry.
- PET performance was evaluated using the NEMA NU-4 protocol, measuring spatial and energy resolution, sensitivity, and scatter fraction.
- Phantom and animal studies were conducted to assess inter-modality alignment and imaging quality.
Main Results:
- PET tangential spatial resolution ranged from 1.56 mm to 2.46 mm.
- Energy resolution averaged 16.5%, coincidence sensitivity was 2.2%, and scatter fractions were 11.45% (mouse phantom) and 23.26% (rat phantom).
- Peak noise equivalent count rates reached 70.8 kcps and 31.5 kcps for mouse and rat phantoms, respectively; inter-modality alignment accuracy was below half the PET resolution.
Conclusions:
- The VrPET/CT system demonstrates good performance as a small-animal imager.
- Its partial-ring design significantly reduces costs compared to full-ring PET tomographs.
- The VrPET/CT is a viable, cost-effective option for in vivo rodent imaging research.

