Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 20, 2026

Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm
Published on: December 24, 2015
The effect of victim information on causality judgments in a rape trial scenario
Daniel M Rempala1, Andrew L Geers
1University of Hawaii, Department of Psychology, Honolulu, HI 96822-2216, USA. rempala@hawaii.edu
Abstract:
D. M. Rempala and F. B. Bernieri (2005) showed that in a date-rape trial scenario, increasing the amount of neutral, nondiagnostic information (i.e., information unrelated to the case) about the rape victim decreases the percentage of guilt verdicts. The authors attempted to determine the causal mechanism for this phenomenon. Participants read 1 of 4 rape trial scenarios (which differed only in the amount of non diagnostic information about the defendant and victim), then provided a verdict and rated the targets on several dimensions. The authors replicated pattern of guilt verdicts in the Rempala and Bernieri study (p < .05), and a path analysis indicated that increased victim information altered causality judgments, which then affected guilt verdicts.
Related Concept Videos
Bystander Effect
Cause and Effect
Theory of Attribution I: Correspondent Inference Theory
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II
Fundamental Attribution Error
Eyewitness Memory
One such error is memory distortion, which occurs because human memory does not function like a...

