Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Motor Units01:13

Motor Units

The motor unit is a fundamental component of the neuromuscular system and plays a crucial role in coordinating muscle contractions. It consists of a somatic motor neuron, which connects and controls multiple skeletal muscle fibers, forming a single functional segment. The axon of the motor neuron branches out and establishes synaptic connections known as neuromuscular junctions with individual muscle fibers within the motor unit.
Motor units come in different sizes, with smaller units...
Motor Units00:46

Motor Units

A motor unit consists of two main components: a single efferent motor neuron (i.e., a neuron that carries impulses away from the central nervous system) and all of the muscle fibers it innervates. The motor neuron may innervate multiple muscle fibers, which are single cells, but only one motor neuron innervates a single muscle fiber.
Motor Unit Stimulation01:20

Motor Unit Stimulation

When the neuron of a motor unit fires an action potential, it triggers a series of events, leading to a twitch contraction in the muscle fibers. The process of excitation-contraction coupling is crucial in relaying the action potential to the muscle fibers.
The latent period of contraction marks the onset of excitation-contraction coupling, when the action potential propagates across the sarcolemma, preparing the muscle fibers for contraction. As the fibers enter the contraction phase, the...
Hierarchy of Motor Control01:18

Hierarchy of Motor Control

The hierarchy of motor control refers to the different levels of organization and processing involved in controlling movement in the body. These levels range from higher cortical areas involved in planning and decision-making to lower spinal cord reflexes that respond automatically to external stimuli.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Novel and traditional anthropometric measures of obesity association with dynapenia in postmenopausal women.

Menopause (New York, N.Y.)·2026
Same author

Higher endometrial thickness prior frozen embryo transfer is associated with lower first-trimester placental growth factor.

European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology·2026
Same author

Pharmacokinetic analysis of nacubactam, a novel β-lactamase inhibitor, co-administered with meropenem in patients with a complicated urinary tract infection.

JAC-antimicrobial resistance·2026
Same author

Metabolic and endocrine factors involved in handgrip strength and dynapenia in postmenopausal women.

Maturitas·2026
Same author

A multi-center, open-label, two-part study to investigate the effect of renal function and hemodialysis on the pharmacokinetics of the novel β-lactamase inhibitor nacubactam.

Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy·2026
Same author

Evidence of intrapulmonary penetration of nacubactam, a novel β-lactamase inhibitor, following coadministration of nacubactam with meropenem in healthy adults.

Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 20, 2026

Assessing Rat Diaphragm Motor Unit Connectivity Outcome Measures as Quantitative Biomarkers of Phrenic Motor Neuron Degeneration and Compensation
06:08

Assessing Rat Diaphragm Motor Unit Connectivity Outcome Measures as Quantitative Biomarkers of Phrenic Motor Neuron Degeneration and Compensation

Published on: April 19, 2024

Comparative evaluation of motor unit architecture models.

Javier Navallas1, Armando Malanda, Luis Gila

  • 1Department of Electric and Electronic Engineerging, Public University of Navarra, 31006, Pamplona, Navarra, Spain. javier.navallas@unavarra.es

Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing
|August 26, 2009
PubMed
Summary

Comparing nine motor unit modeling approaches, this study found that controlled territory placement minimizes edge effects and improves simulation accuracy. Independent, uniform placement leads to unwanted edge effects, impacting simulated motor unit properties.

More Related Videos

Electrophysiological Motor Unit Number Estimation (MUNE) Measuring Compound Muscle Action Potential (CMAP) in Mouse Hindlimb Muscles
09:07

Electrophysiological Motor Unit Number Estimation (MUNE) Measuring Compound Muscle Action Potential (CMAP) in Mouse Hindlimb Muscles

Published on: September 25, 2015

Functional Isolation of Single Motor Units of Rat Medial Gastrocnemius Muscle
06:54

Functional Isolation of Single Motor Units of Rat Medial Gastrocnemius Muscle

Published on: December 26, 2020

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 20, 2026

Assessing Rat Diaphragm Motor Unit Connectivity Outcome Measures as Quantitative Biomarkers of Phrenic Motor Neuron Degeneration and Compensation
06:08

Assessing Rat Diaphragm Motor Unit Connectivity Outcome Measures as Quantitative Biomarkers of Phrenic Motor Neuron Degeneration and Compensation

Published on: April 19, 2024

Electrophysiological Motor Unit Number Estimation (MUNE) Measuring Compound Muscle Action Potential (CMAP) in Mouse Hindlimb Muscles
09:07

Electrophysiological Motor Unit Number Estimation (MUNE) Measuring Compound Muscle Action Potential (CMAP) in Mouse Hindlimb Muscles

Published on: September 25, 2015

Functional Isolation of Single Motor Units of Rat Medial Gastrocnemius Muscle
06:54

Functional Isolation of Single Motor Units of Rat Medial Gastrocnemius Muscle

Published on: December 26, 2020

Area of Science:

  • Biomechanics
  • Computational Biology
  • Motor Control

Background:

  • Motor unit architecture is crucial for muscle function and force generation.
  • Existing models vary in their representation of motor unit territory placement and innervation patterns.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To statistically evaluate and compare nine distinct motor unit architecture modeling approaches.
  • To assess model agreement with established physiological principles.
  • To identify optimal modeling strategies for accurate motor unit simulation.

Main Methods:

  • Statistical evaluation of simulation outcomes from nine motor unit modeling approaches.
  • Combinations of four territory placement algorithms and two innervation pattern algorithms were tested.
  • Comparison against physiological principles and empirical evidence.

Main Results:

  • Uniformly distributed territory placement algorithms result in an 'edge effect,' reducing overlapping motor unit territories at muscle edges.
  • This edge effect negatively impacts the properties of simulated motor units.
  • Controlled motor unit placement, minimizing spatial variance in muscle fiber density (MFD), yields more empirically consistent simulations.

Conclusions:

  • Controlled motor unit territory placement is superior to uniform distribution for accurate modeling.
  • Minimizing spatial variance in MFD is a key factor for realistic motor unit simulations.
  • Findings guide the development of more physiologically relevant computational models of muscle architecture.