Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 20, 2026

Implantation of Total Artificial Heart in Congenital Heart Disease
Published on: July 18, 2014
Current status of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy in heart failure
Ilknur Can1, Venkatakrishna N Tholakanahalli
1Division of Cardiology, University of Minnesota, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Minneapolis, MN 55417, USA.
Insights
Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) are crucial for preventing sudden cardiac arrest in heart failure (HF) patients. Evidence supports ICDs for primary prevention in specific HF populations, improving survival and managing ventricular arrhythmias.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Medical Devices
- Clinical Trials
Background:
- Sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) is a primary cause of mortality in heart failure (HF) patients.
- Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) are the sole evidence-based intervention for survivors of life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias.
- Specific HF patient groups with ischemic and nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy demonstrate benefit from ICD therapy for primary SCA prevention.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review the current evidence and guidelines for implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy in heart failure (HF) patients.
- To summarize the role of ICDs in the primary prevention of sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) in HF.
- To highlight the integration of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in managing severe HF.
Main Methods:
- Review of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) evaluating ICD therapy in heart failure.
- Analysis of current practice guidelines regarding device-based therapy for HF.
- Synthesis of data on ICD efficacy for primary and secondary prevention of sudden cardiac arrest.
Main Results:
- RCTs confirm ICD benefit for primary prevention of SCA in selected HF patients with reduced ejection fraction.
- Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) improves symptoms and survival in severe HF patients with ventricular dyssynchrony.
- ICD therapy is a cornerstone in managing patients at high risk for sudden cardiac death.
Conclusions:
- ICD therapy is recommended for primary prevention of sudden cardiac arrest in specific heart failure populations.
- Cardiac resynchronization therapy is a key device-based treatment for severe heart failure with dyssynchrony.
- This review consolidates current understanding of ICDs and CRT in heart failure management based on robust clinical evidence.
Abstract:
Sudden cardiac arrest is one of the leading causes of death in patients with heart failure (HF). The implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) is the only evidence-based treatment strategy for patients who have survived a life-threatening ventricular arrhythmic event. Randomized clinical trials have shown that specific subsets of HF patients with ischemic and nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy benefit from ICD therapy for primary prevention of sudden cardiac arrest. Cardiac resynchronization therapy has become the device-based therapy of choice for improving symptoms and survival in severe HF patients with evidence of ventricular dyssynchrony. This review summarizes the current status of ICD therapy in treating HF patients based on randomized clinical trials and current practice guidelines.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Heart Failure IV: Classification and Diagnostic Evaluation
Heart Failure V: Medical Management
Dysrhythmias VI: Management of Dysrhythmias
