Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups01:20

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and Cox...
Comparing Copy Number Variations and SNPs02:26

Comparing Copy Number Variations and SNPs

Sequencing of the human genome has opened up several best-kept secrets of the genome. Scientists have identified thousands of genome variations that exist within a population. These variations can be a single nucleotide or a larger chromosomal variation.
Copy number variations or CNVs are the structural variations that cover more than 1kb of DNA sequence. The single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), on the other hand, is a single nucleotide change or a point mutation that is found in more than 1%...
Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons02:54

Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons

Genome comparison is one of the excellent ways to interpret the evolutionary relationships between organisms. The basic principle of genome comparison is that if two species share a common feature, it is likely encoded by the DNA sequence conserved between both species. The advent of genome sequencing technologies in the late 20th century enabled scientists to understand the concept of conservation of domains between species and helped them to deduce evolutionary relationships across diverse...
DNA Microarrays02:34

DNA Microarrays

Microarrays are high-throughput and relatively inexpensive assays that can be automated to analyze large quantities of data at a time. They are used in genome-wide studies to compare gene or protein expression under two varied conditions, such as healthy and diseased states. Microarrays consist of glass or silica slides on which probe molecules are covalently attached through surface functionalization. Most commonly, the slides are prepared through the chemisorption of silanes to silica...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Reproductive status dependent efficacy of exogenous melatonin in ameliorating bisphenol-A (BPA) induced testicular impairments in an annual gonadal cycle of Clarias batrachus.

Chemosphere·2026
Same author

<i>S. aromaticum</i> aqueous extract-derived carbon dots: a biosafe antibacterial nanocatalyst for water remediation.

Journal of materials chemistry. B·2026
Same author

3D Printed Angiogenin-Functionalized Bioresorbable Tubular Conduits for Biological Vascularization.

ACS applied bio materials·2026
Same author

Identifying Flare Prone Spondyloarthritis: Insights From a Prospective Cohort.

Cureus·2026
Same author

Bayesian Multinomial Logistic Normal Models through Marginally Latent Matrix-T Processes.

Journal of machine learning research : JMLR·2026
Same author

Correction: Reciprocal cooperative gating fusion of SqueezeNet and ShuffleNetV2 for breast cancer detection in histopathology images.

Scientific reports·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 20, 2026

A Protocol for Using Gene Set Enrichment Analysis to Identify the Appropriate Animal Model for Translational Research
09:35

A Protocol for Using Gene Set Enrichment Analysis to Identify the Appropriate Animal Model for Translational Research

Published on: August 16, 2017

Comparative study of gene set enrichment methods.

Luca Abatangelo1, Rosalia Maglietta, Angela Distaso

  • 1Istituto di Studi sui Sistemi Intelligenti per l'Automazione, CNR, Bari, Italy. abatangelo@ba.issia.cnr.it

BMC Bioinformatics
|September 4, 2009
PubMed
Summary

This study compares four gene set enrichment analysis methods. Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) and Random-Sets (RS) show promise, but no single method consistently outperforms others for gene expression analysis.

More Related Videos

Using Human Differentially Expressed Gene Lists to Perform Downstream Pathway Enrichment Analysis and Target Prioritization
03:08

Using Human Differentially Expressed Gene Lists to Perform Downstream Pathway Enrichment Analysis and Target Prioritization

Published on: October 3, 2025

High-Throughput Transcriptome Analysis for Investigating Host-Pathogen Interactions
14:58

High-Throughput Transcriptome Analysis for Investigating Host-Pathogen Interactions

Published on: March 5, 2022

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 20, 2026

A Protocol for Using Gene Set Enrichment Analysis to Identify the Appropriate Animal Model for Translational Research
09:35

A Protocol for Using Gene Set Enrichment Analysis to Identify the Appropriate Animal Model for Translational Research

Published on: August 16, 2017

Using Human Differentially Expressed Gene Lists to Perform Downstream Pathway Enrichment Analysis and Target Prioritization
03:08

Using Human Differentially Expressed Gene Lists to Perform Downstream Pathway Enrichment Analysis and Target Prioritization

Published on: October 3, 2025

High-Throughput Transcriptome Analysis for Investigating Host-Pathogen Interactions
14:58

High-Throughput Transcriptome Analysis for Investigating Host-Pathogen Interactions

Published on: March 5, 2022

Area of Science:

  • Bioinformatics
  • Computational Biology
  • Genomics

Background:

  • Analyzing high-throughput gene expression data by gene sets offers advantages over individual gene analysis.
  • Several methods exist for assessing gene set enrichment in differential expression.
  • This study compares Fisher's exact test, Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA), Random-Sets (RS), and Gene List Analysis with Prediction Accuracy (GLAPA).

Purpose of the Study:

  • To comparatively analyze four gene set enrichment methods: Fisher's exact test, GSEA, RS, and GLAPA.
  • To evaluate method performance on simulated and real biological datasets, including cancer data.
  • To understand the differences between associative and predictive statistical approaches in gene set analysis.

Main Methods:

  • Comparative analysis of four gene set enrichment methods.
  • Utilized simulated datasets to initially assess and compare method accuracy.
  • Validated three methods (GSEA, RS, GLAPA) on seven real-world datasets with known genetic perturbations and two cancer datasets.

Main Results:

  • Fisher's exact test was found to be significantly less effective than the other three methods.
  • GSEA and RS effectively detect weak deregulation signals, performing differently with mixed up/down-regulated genes.
  • GLAPA is more conservative, requiring larger phenotypic differences, and its enrichment statistic (prediction error) is a stronger criterion than those used by GSEA and RS.

Conclusions:

  • All three validated methods (GSEA, RS, GLAPA) successfully identify known deregulated gene sets.
  • GSEA appears more consistent in finding enriched gene sets, though no single method is universally superior.
  • The study underscores the distinction between associative (GSEA, RS) and predictive (GLAPA) methods, recommending the use of both for comprehensive pathway analysis interpretation.