Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 20, 2026

Brain Infarct Segmentation and Registration on MRI or CT for Lesion-symptom Mapping
Published on: September 25, 2019
Long-term prognosis of patients with large subcortical infarctions
Yutaka Suto1, Hiroyuki Nakayasu, Masanobu Maeda
1Department of Neurology, Institute of Neurological Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Tottori University, Yonago, Japan. sutou@med.tottori-u.ac.jp
Insights
Large subcortical infarctions (LSCI) have a good long-term prognosis with lower recurrence rates compared to lacunar infarctions. Short-term outcomes for LSCI are similar to atherothrombotic infarctions.
Area of Science:
- Neurology
- Cardiovascular Research
- Stroke Medicine
Background:
- Large subcortical infarctions (LSCI) are a distinct subtype of ischemic stroke.
- Understanding the prognosis of LSCI is crucial for patient management and outcome prediction.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the long-term prognosis of patients diagnosed with large subcortical infarctions (LSCI).
- To compare the clinical characteristics and prognoses of LSCI patients with other stroke subtypes, including lacunar (LACI), atherothrombotic (ATI), and cardioembolic infarctions (CEI).
Main Methods:
- LSCI was defined as lesions greater than or equal to 15 mm affecting deep penetrating arteries without identified cardioembolic or atherothrombotic sources.
- Patients with acute ischemic stroke were consecutively registered and followed for an average of 751 days.
- Outcomes were compared between LSCI, LACI, ATI, and CEI groups.
Main Results:
- Short-term functional outcomes (modified Rankin Scale < or =2) at hospital discharge were similar for LSCI (52.1%) and ATI (47.2%), but worse than for LACI (73.2%).
- After 3 years, mortality rates were LSCI (8.4%), LACI (8.2%), ATI (22.3%), and CEI (41.1%).
- Recurrence rates at 3 years were LSCI (9.3%), LACI (14.1%), ATI (16.6%), and CEI (23.8%).
Conclusions:
- The short-term prognosis for functional outcomes in LSCI is less favorable than in LACI but comparable to ATI.
- The long-term prognosis following a large subcortical infarction is generally good.
- Recurrence rates for LSCI tend to be lower than for lacunar infarctions.
Aim:
We assessed the long-term prognosis of patients with large subcortical infarctions (LSCI).
Methods:
We defined LSCI as lesions > or =15 mm confined to deep penetrating arteries without a cardioembolic or atherothrombotic source. Patients with acute ischemic strokes were consecutively registered and followed for 751 +/- 441 days. The clinical characteristics and long-term prognoses of patients with LSCI were compared to those of patients with lacunar (LACI), atherothrombotic (ATI) and cardioembolic infarctions (CEI).
Results:
At discharge from the hospital, the proportion of good outcomes (modified Rankin Scale < or =2) for patients with LSCI (52.1%) was similar to that for ATIs (47.2%), but worse than that for LACIs (73.2%). After a 3-year follow-up period, the mortality rates from LSCI, LACIs, ATIs and CEIs were 8.4, 8.2, 22.3 and 41.1%, respectively; the recurrence rates were 9.3, 14.1, 16.6 and 23.8%, respectively.
Conclusions:
The short-term prognosis of functional outcomes for LSCI was worse than that for LACIs, but similar to acute-phase ATI outcomes. The long-term prognosis after a LSCI is good, and recurrence tends to be lower than for LACIs.
Related Concept Videos
Ischemic Stroke ll: Pathophysiology
Ischemic Stroke l: Introduction
