Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 20, 2026
11:05
SECONDs Administration Guidelines: A Fast Tool to Assess Consciousness in Brain-injured Patients
Published on: February 6, 2021
First and second things, and the operations of conscience in science
1Professor of Theoretical Medicine, University of Buckingham, United Kingdom.
Medical Hypotheses
|September 8, 2009
Summary
Modern science may be declining due to treating science as a primary goal rather than a subordinate one. Prioritizing scientific status over transcendental truth can lead to corruption and inefficiency in research.
Area of Science:
- Philosophy of Science
- Ethics in Science
Background:
- The essay "First and Second Things" by C.S. Lewis posits that pursuing subordinate goals (Second Things) as primary aims (First Things) leads to their loss.
- This framework is applied to modern science, suggesting that elevating science itself to a First Thing, rather than a means to transcendental truth, causes issues.
Discussion:
- When science is treated as a primary value, community approval and status become the operational definition of correct behavior.
- This shift can lead to a drift from science's proper function, with peer consensus reinforcing corruption.
- Science is argued to be a Second Thing, subordinate to the First Thing of transcendental truth.
Key Insights:
- The pursuit of science as a primary value, divorced from transcendental truth, leads to its degradation.
- Individual conscience, motivated by a conviction in the importance of truth, is crucial for scientific integrity.
- Corruption in science often originates from senior figures who fail to uphold standards and act on conscience.
Outlook:
- Re-establishing transcendental truth as the primary aim is necessary to restore science's proper function and integrity.
- A moral underpinning prioritizing truth is essential for scientists to resist peer-driven corruption.
- Future scientific endeavors must be guided by a commitment to truth to ensure genuine progress and honesty.
Related Concept Videos
02:40The Scientific Method
Research is what makes the difference between facts and opinions. Facts are observable realities, and opinions are personal judgments, conclusions, or attitudes that may or may not be accurate. In the scientific community, facts can be established only using evidence collected through empirical research.
03:50The Scientific Method
Chemistry is an empirical science. Scientists often pose questions to understand the chemistry in everyday life and seek answers to these questions. To achieve this, scientists follow a definitive series of steps that together make up the Scientific Method. This approach involves making observations, asking questions, building a hypothesis, conducting experiments, analyzing results, and forming a conclusion.
01:32The Scientific Method
The scientific method is a detailed, empirical problem-solving process used by biologists and other scientists. This iterative approach involves formulating a question based on observation, developing a testable potential explanation for the observation (called a hypothesis), making and testing predictions based on the hypothesis, and using the findings to create new hypotheses and predictions.Generally, predictions are tested using carefully-designed experiments. Based on the outcome of these...
01:37Reason and Intuition
The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the brain can only use...
01:26Structuralism
Structuralism, an early psychological theory developed by Wilhelm Wundt and his student Edward Bradford Titchener, sought to dissect the human mind into its most fundamental components. Wundt's groundbreaking work in his laboratory set the stage for Titchener to define structuralism's goal as cataloging the "atoms" of the mind—sensations, images, and feelings—akin to how chemists identify elements of matter.
Titchener's approach to structuralism was unique. He employed introspection, a method...
Titchener's approach to structuralism was unique. He employed introspection, a method...
01:19Kohlberg's Theory of Moral Development
Kohlberg's theory of moral development uses the Heinz dilemma — a thought experiment in which a man, Heinz, must decide whether to steal an unaffordable drug to save his dying wife — to illustrate the evolution of moral reasoning. This framework, divided into three levels with two stages, highlights how individuals' understanding of right and wrong becomes increasingly complex.
Pre-Conventional Level
At the pre-conventional level, morality is primarily driven by personal consequences. In Stage...
Pre-Conventional Level
At the pre-conventional level, morality is primarily driven by personal consequences. In Stage...