Related Experiment Videos
Grading the evidence: the core of EBD
1Department of Dental Public Health Sciences, School of Dentistry, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.
The Journal of Evidence-Based Dental Practice
|September 10, 2009
Summary
Public concern over medical drug and device safety has spurred regulation and highlighted the need for reliable evidence. This review examines the evidence pyramid, ranking study types by reliability for evidence-based medicine.
Area of Science:
- Medical research methodology
- Evidence-based medicine
- Scientific literature evaluation
Background:
- Public outcry and regulatory action followed medical drug and device disasters.
- Recognition that not all scientific evidence sources possess equal reliability.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review the evidence pyramid concept.
- To explain the hierarchy of evidence reliability in medicine.
Main Methods:
- Review of existing literature on evidence hierarchies.
- Explanation of the evidence pyramid structure.
Main Results:
- Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) offer more reliable evidence than case-series.
- Human studies are considered more reliable than animal studies.
- Different hierarchies exist to grade evidence reliability.
Conclusions:
- The evidence pyramid is a crucial tool in evidence-based medicine.
- Understanding evidence reliability is essential for informed medical decisions and regulation.
Related Concept Videos
Methods of Documentation V: CBE
Charting by Exception, or CBE, is a method of documentation used in healthcare, particularly in nursing, that focuses on documenting only significant or abnormal findings rather than recording every detail. This approach aims to streamline the documentation process, improve efficiency, and ensure that healthcare providers can quickly identify deviations from normalcy in patient assessments.
In CBE, healthcare professionals establish predefined standards of practice that define what constitutes...
In CBE, healthcare professionals establish predefined standards of practice that define what constitutes...
The Evidence for Evolution
Genetic variations accumulating within populations over generations give rise to biological evolution. Evolutionary changes can result in the formation of novel varieties and entire new species. These changes are responsible for the diverse forms of life inhabiting the planet. The evidence for evolution suggests that all living organisms descended from common ancestors.The collection of fossils within sedimentary rocks give a record of common ancestry and often depicts the history of evolution.
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II
The Bradford Hill criteria serve as guidelines for establishing causative links in epidemiological research. Beyond Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality, key criteria also include Biological Gradient, Plausibility, Coherence, Experiment, and Analogy. These principles assist scientists in assessing the likelihood of causation in complex biological contexts. Below is a summary of these concepts:
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - I
The Bradford Hill criteria are a group of principles that provide a framework to determine a causal relationship between a specific factor and a disease. There are nine criteria that are pivotal in assessing causality in epidemiological studies. Here's a closer look at Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality criteria with definitions and examples:
Types of Aggregate Grading
Aggregate grading is crucial in economically obtaining a concrete mix with adequate strength, reasonable workability, and minimal segregation. There are four types of aggregate gradation: well-graded, uniformly (or one-sized) graded, gap-graded, and open-graded.
Well-graded aggregates include a complete range of necessary size fractions that fit together to create a dense matrix with minimal voids, represented by a smooth, continuous gradation curve. This type of grading ensures good...
Well-graded aggregates include a complete range of necessary size fractions that fit together to create a dense matrix with minimal voids, represented by a smooth, continuous gradation curve. This type of grading ensures good...
Observational Studies
Observational studies are a type of analytical study where researchers observe events without any interventions. In other words, the researcher does not influence the response variable or the experiment's outcome.
There are three types of observational studies – Prospective, retrospective, and cross-sectional.
Prospective Study
Prospective studies, also known as longitudinal or cohort studies, are carried out by collecting future data from groups sharing similar characteristics. One example of...
There are three types of observational studies – Prospective, retrospective, and cross-sectional.
Prospective Study
Prospective studies, also known as longitudinal or cohort studies, are carried out by collecting future data from groups sharing similar characteristics. One example of...