Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs01:15

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs

Bioequivalence experimental study designs play a pivotal role in testing the effectiveness of various treatments. Key among these are the repeated measures, cross-over, carry-over, and Latin square designs. In the repeated measures design, each subject receives all treatments, allowing for temporal comparisons. This type of design is useful in reducing variability but requires careful planning to avoid bias.The cross-over design, an economical method, involves sequential administration of...
Methods of Medium Optimization01:28

Methods of Medium Optimization

Optimizing growth media enhances microbial proliferation and maximizes product yield. Statistical experimental design methodologies provide structured and reproducible approaches, offering progressively higher levels of robustness and efficiency.The One-Factor-at-a-Time (OFAT) MethodThe One-Factor-at-a-Time (OFAT) method involves adjusting a single variable while keeping all others constant. However, it cannot detect interactions between variables, often leading to suboptimal outcomes when...
Factorial Design02:01

Factorial Design

Factorial Analysis is an experimental design that applies Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) statistical procedures to examine a change in a dependent variable due to more than one independent variable, also known as factors. Changes in worker productivity can be reasoned, for example, to be influenced by salary and other conditions, such as skill level. One way to test this hypothesis is by categorizing salary into three levels (low, moderate, and high) and skills sets into two levels (entry level...
Experimental Designs01:16

Experimental Designs

An experimental design is a systematic process that allows researchers to evaluate the relationship between dependent and independent variables. There are three widely used types of experimental design - pre-experimental design, true experimental design, and quasi-experimental design. In pre-experimental design, the researcher compares the data before and after some interventions or treatments. The true-experimental design has more than one purposefully created group, a commonly measured...
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs01:20

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs

Bioequivalence experimental study designs are crucial methodologies used in evaluating and comparing the bioavailability of different drug products. These designs are categorized into various types: completely randomized, randomized block, repeated measures, cross and carry-over, and Latin square designs.Completely randomized designs involve randomly allocating treatments to all subjects participating in the experiment. This allocation is achieved by assigning unique random numbers to subjects...
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Algorithms for Numerical Problem Solving01:29

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Algorithms for Numerical Problem Solving

Mechanistic models play a crucial role in algorithms for numerical problem-solving, particularly in nonlinear mixed effects modeling (NMEM). These models aim to minimize specific objective functions by evaluating various parameter estimates, leading to the development of systematic algorithms. In some cases, linearization techniques approximate the model using linear equations.
In individual population analyses, different algorithms are employed, such as Cauchy's method, which uses a...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Comparing Older Adults Assigned a Low Acuity Triage Score to Their Younger Counterparts in the Emergency Department: A Review of Patient Characteristics and Outcomes.

Cureus·2026
Same author

In-store beverage pricing and marketing before and after a sugar-sweetened beverage tax in Newfoundland and Labrador.

Public health nutrition·2026
Same author

Multi-modal and multi-agent reinforcement learning framework for urban traffic flow prediction and signal control optimization.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Evaluating sugar-sweetened beverage tax effects: online price and sales data from grocers in Canada.

Health promotion international·2025
Same author

Exploring the relationship between boil water advisories and beverage attitudes and intake in adults in Newfoundland and Labrador.

Applied physiology, nutrition, and metabolism = Physiologie appliquee, nutrition et metabolisme·2025
Same author

Sustainable Valorization of Lignocellulose: A Prospective Life Cycle Assessment of Deep Eutectic Solvent-Based Processes and Economic Viability.

Environmental science & technology·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 20, 2026

A Workflow for Lipid Nanoparticle (LNP) Formulation Optimization using Designed Mixture-Process Experiments and Self-Validated Ensemble Models (SVEM)
13:54

A Workflow for Lipid Nanoparticle (LNP) Formulation Optimization using Designed Mixture-Process Experiments and Self-Validated Ensemble Models (SVEM)

Published on: August 18, 2023

Response adaptive designs with a variance-penalized criterion.

Yanqing Yi1, Xikui Wang

  • 1Division of Community Health and Humanities, Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, Newfoundland, Canada A1B 3V6. Yanqing.Yi@med.mun.ca

Biometrical Journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift
|September 17, 2009
PubMed
Summary

This study introduces a new clinical trial design that balances patient allocation and statistical power. The proposed response adaptive design offers improved efficiency compared to existing methods.

More Related Videos

Probing the Limits of Egg Recognition Using Egg Rejection Experiments Along Phenotypic Gradients
07:34

Probing the Limits of Egg Recognition Using Egg Rejection Experiments Along Phenotypic Gradients

Published on: August 22, 2018

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 20, 2026

A Workflow for Lipid Nanoparticle (LNP) Formulation Optimization using Designed Mixture-Process Experiments and Self-Validated Ensemble Models (SVEM)
13:54

A Workflow for Lipid Nanoparticle (LNP) Formulation Optimization using Designed Mixture-Process Experiments and Self-Validated Ensemble Models (SVEM)

Published on: August 18, 2023

Probing the Limits of Egg Recognition Using Egg Rejection Experiments Along Phenotypic Gradients
07:34

Probing the Limits of Egg Recognition Using Egg Rejection Experiments Along Phenotypic Gradients

Published on: August 22, 2018

Area of Science:

  • Clinical Trial Design
  • Biostatistics
  • Medical Research Methodology

Background:

  • Response adaptive designs in clinical trials dynamically adjust treatment allocation based on accumulating data.
  • Evaluating these designs requires balancing patient outcomes with statistical efficiency.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce a novel response adaptive design for clinical trials using a variance-penalized criterion.
  • To assess the performance of this design in terms of patient allocation and statistical power.
  • To compare the proposed design with existing methods like the drop-the-loser design.

Main Methods:

  • A variance-penalized criterion is employed to evaluate design performance.
  • A new proportion for treatment allocation is proposed.
  • The doubly biased coin procedure is utilized to achieve the proposed allocation proportion.

Main Results:

  • The proposed design's criterion considers both the number of patients on the better treatment and statistical test power.
  • The new design demonstrates a smaller asymptotic variance of allocation proportions than the drop-the-loser design.
  • Simulation results show favorable comparisons with existing clinical trial designs.

Conclusions:

  • The proposed response adaptive design offers an improved approach to clinical trial methodology.
  • This design effectively balances treatment allocation and statistical power.
  • The variance-penalized criterion provides a robust method for evaluating adaptive designs.