Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 20, 2026

Quantification of the Immunosuppressant Tacrolimus on Dried Blood Spots Using LC-MS/MS
Published on: November 8, 2015
Mycophenolate mofetil and calcineurin-inhibitor reduction: recent progress
Josep M Grinyó1, Josep M Cruzado
1Nephrology Department, Hospital Univeritari de Bellvitge, Idibell, University of Barcelona, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain. jgrinyo@bellvitgehospital.cat
Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) with calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) reduces rejection. Avoiding CNIs with MMF increases rejection risk, but CNI elimination may improve outcomes in some patients.
Area of Science:
- Nephrology
- Immunosuppression
- Transplantation
Background:
- Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) combined with calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) effectively reduces acute rejection rates in organ transplantation.
- MMF was initially expected to mitigate CNI-associated nephrotoxicity due to its immunosuppressive properties.
- However, complete avoidance of CNIs in MMF-based immunosuppression regimens has led to increased risks of acute and chronic rejection.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the impact of calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) elimination versus minimization in patients receiving mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) based immunosuppression.
- To assess the risk-benefit balance of different CNI strategies in kidney transplant recipients.
- To explore the potential of novel CNI-free immunosuppression protocols, such as MMF with belatacept.
Main Methods:
- Review of a recent meta-analysis on CNI elimination in MMF-treated patients with renal dysfunction.
- Analysis of outcomes associated with CNI minimization strategies combined with MMF.
- Consideration of emerging CNI-free immunosuppression approaches and monitoring tools.
Main Results:
- A meta-analysis indicated that CNI elimination in MMF-treated patients with progressive renal dysfunction may be linked to better outcomes, though further research is required.
- CNI minimization alongside MMF has demonstrated improvements in renal function and maintained a low risk of rejection, suggesting a favorable risk/benefit profile.
- MMF in combination with belatacept presents a potential future strategy for CNI-free immunosuppression.
Conclusions:
- While CNI elimination shows promise for specific patient groups, CNI minimization with MMF offers a balanced approach with improved renal function and low rejection rates.
- Future CNI-free strategies, such as MMF with belatacept, warrant further investigation.
- Advanced immunological risk assessment tools may be crucial for the successful implementation of CNI-sparing protocols.
Related Concept Videos
Drugs for Treatment of Crohn's Disease in IBD Using Immunomodulatory Agents
Drugs for Treatment of Crohn's Disease in IBD Using Glucocorticoids
Drugs for Treatment of Crohn's Disease in IBD Using Biologic Agents: Anti-TNF
Inflammatory Bowel Disease IV: Pharmacological Management
Pharmacologic...
Drugs for Treatment of Ulcerative Colitis in IBD
Pharmacogenetics of Phase II Enzymes: N-acetyltransferase, Thiopurine S-methyltransferase, UDP-glucuronosyltransferase