Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 19, 2026

Facet-to-facet Linking of Shape-anisotropic Colloidal Cadmium Chalcogenide Nanostructures
Published on: August 10, 2017
Understanding interactions between capped nanocrystals: three-body and chain packing effects.
Philipp Schapotschnikow1, Thijs J H Vlugt
1Process and Energy Laboratory, Delft University of Technology, Leeghwaterstraat 44, 2628 CA Delft, The Netherlands.
Molecular simulations reveal that ligand interactions govern the self-assembly of gold nanocrystals (NCs). Three-body effects influence NC arrangement, favoring chains over close packing with longer ligands, and an overlap cone model explains equilibrium distances.
Area of Science:
- Materials Science
- Nanotechnology
- Computational Chemistry
Background:
- Self-assembly of capped nanocrystals (NCs) is a key area in materials science.
- Understanding the mechanical and thermodynamic stability of NC superstructures is limited.
- Controlling interactions between NCs is crucial for advanced applications.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the origin and magnitude of interactions in self-assembled gold NCs.
- To explore methods for rationally manipulating these interactions.
- To understand how ligand length and NC size affect self-assembly.
Main Methods:
- Molecular simulations of interacting gold NCs protected by capping molecules (ligands).
- Computation of the potential of mean force for pairs and triplets of NCs.
- Simulation of NCs with varying sizes (1.8-3.7 nm) and ligand lengths (ethanethiol-dodecanethiol) in vacuum.
Main Results:
- Pair interactions are strongly attractive due to van der Waals forces between ligands.
- Three-body interactions introduce an energy penalty upon ligand overlap, significant for short ligands.
- Longer ligands promote NC chain formation over close packing, aligning with experimental findings.
Conclusions:
- The overlap cone model accurately predicts equilibrium distances between NCs based on ligand packing.
- Equilibrium distance is consistently ~1.25 times the core diameter, independent of ligand length.
- Predictions are made for ligand choices favoring stable 3D structures versus high-quality monolayers.
More Related Videos
08:39Liquid-cell Transmission Electron Microscopy for Tracking Self-assembly of Nanoparticles
Published on: October 16, 2017
09:12Functionalization of Single-walled Carbon Nanotubes with Thermo-reversible Block Copolymers and Characterization by Small-angle Neutron Scattering
Published on: June 1, 2016
Related Concept Videos
Metallic Solids
All metallic solids exhibit high thermal and electrical conductivity, metallic luster, and malleability. Many...
Ionic Crystal Structures
Most monatomic ions behave as charged spheres, and their attraction for ions of opposite charge is the same in every direction. Consequently, stable structures for ionic compounds result (1) when ions of one charge are surrounded by as many ions as possible of the opposite...
Spin–Spin Coupling: Three-Bond Coupling (Vicinal Coupling)
The extent of coupling depends on the C‑C bond length, the two H‑C‑C angles, any electron-withdrawing substituents, and the dihedral angle between the involved orbitals. The...
Complexation Equilibria: The Chelate Effect
Crystal Field Theory - Octahedral Complexes
To explain the observed behavior of transition metal complexes (such as colors), a model involving electrostatic interactions between the electrons from the ligands and the electrons in the unhybridized d orbitals of the central metal atom has been developed. This electrostatic model is crystal field theory (CFT). It helps to understand, interpret, and predict the colors, magnetic behavior, and some structures of coordination compounds of transition metals.
CFT focuses on...
Crystal Field Theory - Tetrahedral and Square Planar Complexes
Crystal field theory (CFT) is applicable to molecules in geometries other than octahedral. In octahedral complexes, the lobes of the dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals point directly at the ligands. For tetrahedral complexes, the d orbitals remain in place, but with only four ligands located between the axes. None of the orbitals points directly at the tetrahedral ligands. However, the dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals (along the Cartesian axes) overlap with the ligands less than the dxy,...