Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 19, 2026

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues
Published on: June 3, 2013
Why does picture-plane inversion sometimes dissociate perception of features and spacing in faces, and sometimes not?
1Department of Psychology, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia. elinor.mckone@anu.edu.au
Abstract:
Classically, it has been presumed that picture-plane inversion primarily reduces sensitivity to spacing/configural information in faces (distance between location of the major features) and has little effect on sensitivity to local feature information (e.g., eye shape or color). Here, we review 22 published studies relevant to this claim. Data show that the feature inversion effect varied substantially across studies as a function of the following factors: whether the feature change was shape only or included color/brightness, the number of faces in the stimulus set, and whether the feature was in facial context. For shape-only changes in facial context, feature inversion effects were as large as typical spacing inversion effects. Small feature inversion effects occurred only when a task could be efficiently solved by visual-processing areas outside whole-face coding. The results argue that holistic/configural processing for upright faces integrates exact feature shape and spacing between blobs. We describe two plausible approaches to this process.
Related Concept Videos
Gestalt Principles of Perception
Parallel Processing
Gestalt Psychology
Depth Perception and Spatial Vision
Perception
Bottom-up processing begins at the sensory level, where receptors detect external environmental stimuli. These could include the tactile sensation of...
Factors Affecting Perception
An illustrative example of a perceptual set is the scenario where an airline pilot told...

