Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 19, 2026

06:17
A Task for Assessing the Impact of a Partner on the Speed and Accuracy of Motor Performance in Rats
Published on: October 17, 2019
Research note: effect of load reductions over consecutive sets on repetition performance
Jeffrey M Willardson1, Mark S Kattenbraker, Maureen Khairallah
1Human Performance Laboratory, Eastern Illinois University, Charleston, Illinois, USA. jmwillardson@eiu.edu
Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research
|October 10, 2009
Summary
To maintain repetition performance during resistance training with short rest intervals, reducing the load is crucial. Exercises like the back squat and leg curl necessitate a 15% load reduction per set, unlike the leg extension.
Area of Science:
- Exercise Physiology
- Sports Science
- Biomechanics
Background:
- Maintaining repetition performance is key for muscular adaptations in resistance training.
- Short rest intervals (< or = 1 min) between sets challenge repetition maintenance and may necessitate load adjustments.
- Understanding optimal load management strategies is vital for effective training program design.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare repetition performance across different load reduction strategies during consecutive sets of lower-body resistance exercises.
- To determine the necessity of load reductions for maintaining performance in exercises like the back squat, leg curl, and leg extension.
- To identify specific load reduction percentages required to sustain repetition targets under fatiguing conditions.
Main Methods:
- Established ten-repetition maximum (10RM) loads for back squat, leg curl, and leg extension.
- Subjects completed four workouts with varying load conditions: constant load, 5% reduction, 10% reduction, and 15% reduction per set.
- Analyzed and compared the number of repetitions completed across sets and conditions using statistical pairwise comparisons.
Main Results:
- The back squat and leg curl required a 15% load reduction per set to maintain repetition performance compared to a constant load.
- No significant differences in repetitions were observed for the leg extension across all tested load conditions.
- Fewer repetitions were completed in set 3 under constant, 5%, and 10% load reduction conditions compared to the 15% reduction condition, averaged across exercises.
Conclusions:
- Significant load reductions (15% per set) are necessary for the back squat and leg curl to maintain repetition performance with short rest intervals.
- The leg extension may not require load reductions to sustain repetition performance under similar training conditions.
- Exercise-specific strategies for load management are essential for optimizing training outcomes and adherence to repetition targets.

