A comparison of user-generated and automatic graph layouts
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 19, 2026

ExCYT: A Graphical User Interface for Streamlining Analysis of High-Dimensional Cytometry Data
Published on: January 16, 2019
Tim Dwyer1, Bongshin Lee, Danyel Fisher
1Microsoft Research. timdwyer@microsoft.com
Abstract:
The research presented in this paper compares user-generated and automatic graph layouts. Following the methods suggested by van Ham et al. (2008), a group of users generated graph layouts using both multi-touch interaction on a tabletop display and mouse interaction on a desktop computer. Users were asked to optimize their layout for aesthetics and analytical tasks with a social network. We discuss characteristics of the user-generated layouts and interaction methods employed by users in this process. We then report on a web-based study to compare these layouts with the output of popular automatic layout algorithms. Our results demonstrate that the best of the user-generated layouts performed as well as or better than the physics-based layout. Orthogonal and circular automatic layouts were found to be considerably less effective than either the physics-based layout or the best of the user-generated layouts. We highlight several attributes of the various layouts that led to high accuracy and improved task completion time, as well as aspects in which traditional automatic layout methods were unsuccessful for our tasks.
Related Concept Videos
Bar Graph
Multiple Bar Graph
Each bar or column in the multiple bar graph represents a data value. These graphs are used primarily in interrelating two or more sets of data. The categories of different kinds of data are listed along the horizontal or x-axis, whereas...
Graphs of Two-Variable Functions
Ogive Graph
Time-Series Graph
Graphs of Functions