Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 19, 2026

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime
Published on: May 3, 2016
Faking good on the MCMI-III: implications for child custody evaluations
1School of Psychology, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Western Australia.
Abstract:
Individuals administered the MCMI-III (Millon, Davis, & Millon, 1997) as part of a custody evaluation have shown elevations on the Desirability (Y), Histrionic (4), Narcissistic (5), and Compulsive (7) scales and low scores on the Debasement (Z) scale (McCann et al., 2001) and all other personality and clinical scales. In this experiment, we instructed participants (N = 138) to look like good parents (fake good) or to answer honestly. The fake-good group scored higher than the honest group on Y, 4, 5, and 7 and lower on scale Z and most other scales. We plotted the mean scale scores of our fake-good group against those of McCann et al.'s custody litigants and found the 2 profiles to be very closely matched and very different from our answer-honestly group's profile. These findings raise the possibility that scale elevations on 4, 5, and 7 by custody litigants are artifacts of faking good rather than pathology in those areas. Assessors should interpret this profile cautiously in custody evaluations.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification
Self-Report Tests of Personality
Self-Evaluation Maintenance Model
False Memories
One primary source of false memories is misattribution, where individuals incorrectly associate external information with...
McNemar's Test
Multiple Comparison Tests
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...

