Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Decision Making: Traditional Method01:14

Decision Making: Traditional Method

4.3K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
4.3K
Decision Making: P-value Method01:09

Decision Making: P-value Method

5.9K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim  is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses:  a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
5.9K
Decision Making01:20

Decision Making

345
Decision-making is a fundamental cognitive process that involves evaluating alternatives and selecting among them. This process can range from simple choices, such as deciding what to wear, to complex decisions, like choosing a major in college or a career path. The complexity of the decision often dictates the approach we use, which can be broadly categorized into two types: automatic and controlled decision-making.
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
345
Self-Evaluation Maintenance Model01:29

Self-Evaluation Maintenance Model

55
The Self-Evaluation Maintenance (SEM) model offers a psychological framework to understand how individuals’ self-esteem is influenced by the achievements of others, particularly those with whom they share close personal bonds. The SEM model operates when personal rather than social identity guides individuals. Central to this model is the notion that individuals have an inherent desire to preserve a favorable self-image, which is continuously shaped by interpersonal comparisons and...
55
Models, Theories, and Laws01:16

Models, Theories, and Laws

7.7K
Scientists frequently use models to help them comprehend a specific collection of phenomena. In physics, a model is a condensed version of a physical system that is too complex to study thoroughly. One such example is the light wave model; unlike water waves, light waves are typically invisible to us. Nonetheless, it is helpful to think of light as being composed of waves, since investigations show that light behaves like water waves. Since it is impossible to visually see what is genuinely...
7.7K
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Algorithms for Numerical Problem Solving01:29

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Algorithms for Numerical Problem Solving

130
Mechanistic models play a crucial role in algorithms for numerical problem-solving, particularly in nonlinear mixed effects modeling (NMEM). These models aim to minimize specific objective functions by evaluating various parameter estimates, leading to the development of systematic algorithms. In some cases, linearization techniques approximate the model using linear equations.
In individual population analyses, different algorithms are employed, such as Cauchy's method, which uses a...
130

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Approach-Avoidance Motivation and Goal Adaptation in Chronic Pain: Predicting Pain Intensity and Interference.

International journal of environmental research and public health·2026
Same author

As Effective as You Perceive It: The Relationship Between ChatGPT's Perceived Effectiveness and Mental Health Stigma.

Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)·2025
Same author

The most influential decision factors for choosing a formal diagnostic classification system for describing personality pathology.

Personality disorders·2025
Same author

Anticipating environmental losses: Effects on place attachment and intentions to move.

Journal of migration and health·2023
Same author

Factors underlying clinicians' judgements of patient insight and confidence in using clinical judgement in psycho-legal settings.

Psychiatry, psychology, and law : an interdisciplinary journal of the Australian and New Zealand Association of Psychiatry, Psychology and Law·2020
Same author

Psychological reports for sentencing juveniles in Australian courts.

Psychiatry, psychology, and law : an interdisciplinary journal of the Australian and New Zealand Association of Psychiatry, Psychology and Law·2020

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 19, 2025

Assessing Dyslexia at Six Year of Age
15:00

Assessing Dyslexia at Six Year of Age

Published on: May 1, 2020

8.5K

A decision-making model for pre-sentence evaluations for juveniles.

Debra Bycroft1, Greg E Dear1, Deirdre Drake1

  • 1Psychology and Criminology, Edith Cowan University, Perth, WA, Australia.

Psychiatry, Psychology, and Law : an Interdisciplinary Journal of the Australian and New Zealand Association of Psychiatry, Psychology and Law
|September 23, 2021
PubMed
Summary

Forensic mental health assessments (FMHAs) lack Australian standards, impacting juveniles. This study proposes a 10-step model to improve the quality and consistency of these crucial pre-sentence evaluations.

Keywords:
Australiaforensic mental health assessmentjuvenilemodelpre-sentencereport

More Related Videos

A Novel Model of Mild Traumatic Brain Injury for Juvenile Rats
07:36

A Novel Model of Mild Traumatic Brain Injury for Juvenile Rats

Published on: December 8, 2014

23.9K
Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents
07:05

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents

Published on: September 10, 2018

6.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 19, 2025

Assessing Dyslexia at Six Year of Age
15:00

Assessing Dyslexia at Six Year of Age

Published on: May 1, 2020

8.5K
A Novel Model of Mild Traumatic Brain Injury for Juvenile Rats
07:36

A Novel Model of Mild Traumatic Brain Injury for Juvenile Rats

Published on: December 8, 2014

23.9K
Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents
07:05

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents

Published on: September 10, 2018

6.1K

Area of Science:

  • Forensic Psychology
  • Legal Psychology
  • Child Psychology

Background:

  • Forensic mental health assessments (FMHAs) are court-ordered evaluations crucial for juvenile sentencing.
  • A lack of standardized guidelines in Australia raises concerns about the quality and methodology of these assessments.
  • Psychologists without specific forensic training sometimes conduct these evaluations, potentially impacting report reliability.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To address the absence of formal standards for FMHAs in Australia.
  • To propose a structured decision-making model for juvenile pre-sentence evaluations.
  • To provide a foundation for developing practice guidelines and professional standards in forensic psychology.

Main Methods:

  • Critical literature review.
  • Analysis of recent research findings in forensic psychology.
  • Development of a 10-step decision-making model for juvenile pre-sentence evaluations.

Main Results:

  • A proposed 10-step decision-making model for juvenile forensic mental health assessments.
  • The model outlines key elements for sound evaluation methodologies.
  • Identified a need for formalized Australian minimum standards for FMHAs.

Conclusions:

  • The proposed model offers a framework to enhance the quality and consistency of juvenile pre-sentence reports.
  • Implementation of the model could lead to improved practice guidelines and professional standards.
  • Field testing is recommended to validate the model's impact on report quality.