Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Inductive Reasoning00:59

Inductive Reasoning

Inductive reasoning is a form of logical thinking that uses related observations to arrive at a general conclusion. It is uncertain and operates in degrees to which the conclusions are credible. As such, inductive arguments can be weak or strong, rather than valid or invalid, and conclusions can be used to formulate testable, falsifiable hypotheses.Inductive reasoning is common in descriptive science. A life scientist makes observations and records them. This data can be qualitative or...
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II01:28

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II

The Bradford Hill criteria serve as guidelines for establishing causative links in epidemiological research. Beyond Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality, key criteria also include Biological Gradient, Plausibility, Coherence, Experiment, and Analogy. These principles assist scientists in assessing the likelihood of causation in complex biological contexts. Below is a summary of these concepts:
Deductive Reasoning01:16

Deductive Reasoning

Deductive reasoning, or deduction, is the type of logic used in hypothesis-based science. In deductive reasoning, the pattern of thinking moves in the opposite direction from inductive reasoning. It uses a general principle or law to predict specific results. From these general principles, a scientist can predict specific results that remain valid as long as the general principles are correct.For example, a researcher can make specific predictions from the hypothesis "butterflies are attracted...
Theory of Attribution I: Correspondent Inference Theory01:15

Theory of Attribution I: Correspondent Inference Theory

Correspondent inference theory, proposed by Jones and Davis in 1965, seeks to explain how individuals infer stable personality traits from observed behaviors. It suggests that people attribute actions to underlying dispositions rather than external circumstances, particularly when the behavior appears intentional and socially significant.Voluntary Behavior and Dispositional AttributionAccording to this theory, individuals are more likely to attribute behavior to personal traits when it appears...
Cause and Effect01:53

Cause and Effect

While variables are sometimes correlated because one does cause the other, it could also be that some other factor, a confounding variable, is actually causing the systematic movement in our variables of interest. For instance, as sales in ice cream increase, so does the overall rate of crime. Is it possible that indulging in your favorite flavor of ice cream could send you on a crime spree? Or, after committing crime do you think you might decide to treat yourself to a cone?
Mathematical Induction01:29

Mathematical Induction

Mathematical induction is a structured method of proof used to confirm the truth of statements involving natural numbers. Consider the sum of the first n natural numbers:This formula describes a pattern that appears to hold true as more terms are added. To verify that it is valid for all natural numbers, mathematical induction proceeds in two essential steps. The first is the base case, where the formula is tested for the initial value, typically n = 1. Substituting into both sides confirms the...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A folk taxonomy of magic.

Cognition·2026
Same author

A reporting checklist for large language models in behavioural science.

Nature human behaviour·2026
Same author

Resolving Feynman's restaurant problem reveals optimal solutions and human strategies.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same author

Considering Psychological Mechanisms Can Change the Interpretation of Bayesian Models.

Topics in cognitive science·2026
Same author

Conniving With Continuations: Representing Goals in a Domain-Specific Language of Thought.

Topics in cognitive science·2026
Same author

Neural representation of action symbols in primate frontal cortex.

Nature·2026
Same journal

Perception and action as one: Re-integrating research on human action through event files.

Psychological review·2026
Same journal

Associative learning explains "intuitive statistics" in animals.

Psychological review·2026
Same journal

A reciprocal model of practice and skill: Navigating between dropout and expertise.

Psychological review·2026
Same journal

The relative psychometric function: A general analysis framework for relating psychological processes.

Psychological review·2026
Same journal

A taxonomy of discriminatory behavior.

Psychological review·2026
Same journal

Extreme-value signal detection theory for recognition memory: The parametric road not taken.

Psychological review·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 19, 2026

Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal
06:45

Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal

Published on: April 18, 2017

Theory-based causal induction.

Thomas L Griffiths1, Joshua B Tenenbaum

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720-1650, USA. tom_griffiths@berkeley.edu

Psychological Review
|October 21, 2009
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

People excel at inferring cause-and-effect relationships from limited data by integrating general statistical inference with domain-specific prior knowledge about causal theories.

More Related Videos

Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task
06:08

Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task

Published on: July 22, 2025

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 19, 2026

Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal
06:45

Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal

Published on: April 18, 2017

Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task
06:08

Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task

Published on: July 22, 2025

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Science
  • Machine Learning
  • Statistics

Background:

  • Causal induction from observations is a fundamental challenge in science and human learning.
  • People effectively infer causal structures from diverse data types, yet these processes are often studied in isolation.
  • Identifying unobservable causal mechanisms from sparse data remains a significant inductive problem.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To present a unified computational framework for causal induction.
  • To model diverse forms of causal learning within a common language.
  • To analyze the role of domain-specific prior knowledge in causal inference.

Main Methods:

  • Computational-level analysis of causal induction.
  • Development of a framework integrating statistical inference and abstract causal theories.
  • Identification of key aspects of prior knowledge constraining causal models.

Main Results:

  • Causal induction is framed as domain-general statistical inference guided by domain-specific abstract causal theories.
  • A common language is established to model various causal learning modes.
  • Three key aspects of prior knowledge (ontology, plausibility, functional form) are identified as crucial constraints.

Conclusions:

  • Abstract causal theories provide essential constraints for inducing causal models from sparse data.
  • The proposed framework unifies diverse causal learning mechanisms.
  • Understanding prior knowledge is key to explaining human causal induction capabilities.