Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 19, 2026

Fast Imaging Technique to Study Drop Impact Dynamics of Non-Newtonian Fluids
Published on: March 5, 2014
Dynamics of wetting revisited
D Seveno1, A Vaillant, R Rioboo
1Laboratory for physics of surfaces and interfaces, University of Mons, Parc Initialis, Avenue Copernic, MateriaNova, 7000 Mons, Belgium. david.seveno@umons.ac.be
New analysis of dynamic wetting data using G-Dyna software reveals limitations in distinguishing between wetting models. Even with accurate measurements, reliably identifying the best model for a specific system remains challenging.
Area of Science:
- Physical Chemistry
- Fluid Dynamics
- Materials Science
Background:
- Dynamic wetting describes liquid behavior on surfaces over time.
- Existing models attempt to explain spreading dynamics but have limitations.
- Accurate experimental data is crucial for validating these models.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze spreading-drop data across a wide time range.
- To evaluate the applicability of different dynamic wetting models.
- To assess the reliability of model selection based on experimental data.
Main Methods:
- Collected precise contact angle and droplet radius data for four liquids on silica surfaces.
- Utilized novel G-Dyna software for data analysis and model fitting.
- Applied hydrodynamic, molecular-kinetic, and combined theoretical models.
Main Results:
- G-Dyna software accurately processed hundreds of measurements.
- Analysis showed difficulty in definitively selecting the best-fit model.
- Parameter distributions and correlations provided insights into model performance.
Conclusions:
- Even high-quality data and robust fitting may not reliably distinguish between dynamic wetting models.
- Claims about model superiority require careful consideration of data set size and fitting stringency.
- The study highlights the complexities in validating theoretical models with experimental results.
More Related Videos
07:18Measuring the Interaction Force Between a Droplet and a Super-hydrophobic Substrate by the Optical Lever Method
Published on: June 14, 2019
08:02Rendering SiO2/Si Surfaces Omniphobic by Carving Gas-Entrapping Microtextures Comprising Reentrant and Doubly Reentrant Cavities or Pillars
Published on: February 11, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Theories of Dissolution: The Danckwerts' Model and Interfacial Barrier Model
Surface Tension, Capillary Action, and Viscosity
The various IMFs between identical molecules of a substance are examples of cohesive forces. The molecules within a liquid are surrounded by other molecules and are attracted equally in all directions by the cohesive forces within the liquid. However, the molecules on the surface of a liquid are attracted only by about one-half as many molecules. Because of the unbalanced molecular attractions on the surface molecules, liquids contract to form a shape that minimizes the number...
Partial Differential Equations
Surface Tension of Fluid
Surface tension varies with...
Theories of Dissolution: Diffusion Layer Model
This process starts with a thin layer, saturated with the drug, forming at the interface between the solid and liquid. The solute then diffuses from this layer into the main solution. The Noyes-Whitney equation suggests that the rate of dissolution relies on the diffusion...
Characteristics of Dry Friction
Before the wheelbarrow starts moving, the static frictional force acts tangentially to the contact surface, opposing the force that is about to induce the motion. This frictional force prevents the...