Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 19, 2026

Sexual Transmission of American Trypanosomes from Males and Females to Naive Mates
Published on: January 27, 2019
Evaluation of adult chronic Chagas' heart disease diagnosis by molecular and serological methods
Juan David Ramírez1, Felipe Guhl, Eufrosina Setsu Umezawa
1Facultad de Ciencias, Departamento de Ciencias Biológicas, Centro de Investigaciones en Microbiología y Parasitología Tropical, CIMPAT, Universidad de los Andes, Carrera 1 No 18A 10, Bogotá, Colombia.
Insights
Conventional serological tests, like IIF and ELISA, are highly sensitive for diagnosing chronic Chagas' disease. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays show lower sensitivity and are not recommended as a primary diagnostic tool.
Area of Science:
- Infectious Diseases
- Parasitology
- Molecular Diagnostics
Background:
- Chagas' disease, caused by Trypanosoma cruzi, is a significant public health issue in Latin America.
- Trypanosoma cruzi exhibits genetic diversity, with T. cruzi I and T. cruzi II being the main lineages.
- Current chronic phase diagnosis relies on serological tests (IIF, ELISA), while acute phase diagnosis uses parasitological methods.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate diagnostic procedures for chronic Chagas' disease in adult patients.
- To compare the sensitivity of PCR assays against conventional serological tests.
- To establish TESA-blot as the gold standard for comparison.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of samples from 240 adult patients with chronic Chagas' disease.
- Evaluation of PCR using kinetoplast and nuclear repetitive regions.
- Comparison with serological tests: Indirect Immunofluorescence (IIF), Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA), and TESA-blot.
Main Results:
- TESA-blot served as the gold standard for sensitivity comparisons.
- Sensitivities: IIF (99%), ELISA (95%), PCR (kinetoplast region, 70%), PCR (nuclear repetitive region, 75%).
- Low concordance between PCR and serology results was observed.
Conclusions:
- PCR assays are not validated as conventional diagnostic techniques for chronic Chagas' disease due to insufficient sensitivity.
- Serological tests, particularly IIF and ELISA, demonstrate high reliability.
- PCR may serve as an alternative diagnostic support and for monitoring treatment efficacy using the nuclear repetitive region.
Abstract:
Chagas' disease caused by Trypanosoma cruzi is endemic in Latin America. T. cruzi presents heterogeneous populations and comprises two main genetic lineages, named T. cruzi I and T. cruzi II. Diagnosis in the chronic phase is based on conventional serological tests, including indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and diagnosis in the acute phase based on parasitological methods, including hemoculture. The objective of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic procedures of Chagas' disease in adult patients in the chronic phase by using a PCR assay and conventional serological tests, including TESA-blot as the gold standard. Samples were obtained from 240 clinical chronic chagasic patients. The sensitivities, compared to that of TESA-blot, were 70% for PCR using the kinetoplast region, 75% for PCR using the nuclear repetitive region, 99% for IIF, and 95% for ELISA. According to the serological tests results, we recommend that researchers assess the reliability and sensitivity of the commercial kit Chagatest ELISA recombinant, version 3.0 (Chagatest Rec v3.0; Wiener Lab, Rosario, Argentina), due to the lack of sensitivity. Based on our analysis, we concluded that PCR cannot be validated as a conventional diagnostic technique for Chagas' disease. These data have been corroborated by low levels of concordance with serology test results. It is recommended that PCR be used only for alternative diagnostic support. Using the nuclear repetitive region of T. cruzi, PCR could also be applicable for monitoring patients receiving etiologic treatment.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
American Trypanosomiasis
Rheumatic Heart Disease II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Myocarditis II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease-IV: Assessement and Diagnostic Studies
Medical History
Heart Failure IV: Classification and Diagnostic Evaluation

