Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 19, 2026
09:02
Cortical Bone Assessment Using Ultrasonic Guided Waves: A Reproducibility Study in a Healthy Population
Published on: January 31, 2025
N1m amplitude growth function for bone-conducted ultrasound
Tadashi Nishimura1, Seiji Nakagawa, Akinori Yamashita
1Department of Otolaryngology, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Japan. t-nishim@naramed-u.ac.jp
Acta Oto-Laryngologica. Supplementum
|October 24, 2009
Summary
Bone-conducted ultrasound perception differs from air-conducted sound, with distinct neural responses (N1m amplitude) and a narrower dynamic range. This suggests unique central auditory processing for ultrasound via bone conduction.
Area of Science:
- Auditory Neuroscience
- Psychoacoustics
- Biophysics
Background:
- Bone conduction allows ultrasound perception, but its mechanisms remain unclear.
- Understanding ultrasonic perception is crucial for auditory science.
Purpose of the Study:
- Investigate human ultrasonic perception, focusing on stimulus intensity effects.
- Clarify the perceptual differences between bone-conducted ultrasound and air-conducted sound.
Main Methods:
- Measured N1m amplitude changes across the psychoacoustical dynamic range.
- Compared responses to 30 kHz bone-conducted ultrasound and 1 kHz air-conducted sound.
Main Results:
- Bone-conducted ultrasound had a significantly narrower dynamic range (18.2 dB) than air-conducted sound (85.9 dB).
- N1m amplitude grew faster with stimulus level for bone-conducted ultrasound.
- Ultrasound N1m amplitude continued growing above the uncomfortable loudness level, unlike air-conducted sound.
Conclusions:
- N1m amplitude growth patterns reveal distinct central auditory processing for bone-conducted ultrasound versus air-conducted sound.
- These findings highlight unique neural pathways involved in ultrasonic perception through bone conduction.
