Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Novel 1550-nm Nonablative Resurfacing Laser With Focal Point Technology Improves Fine Lines and Wrinkles With High Energy Delivery.

Dermatologic surgery : official publication for American Society for Dermatologic Surgery [et al.]·2026
Same author

Regional Differences in Postexcision Outcomes of Keloids: A Focus on Auricular Versus Nonauricular Sites.

Annals of plastic surgery·2026
Same author

How We Do It: Minimally Invasive Removal of Osteoma Cutis With Novel 2,910-nm Fiber Laser-Enabled Tissue Coring.

Dermatologic surgery : official publication for American Society for Dermatologic Surgery [et al.]·2026
Same author

Improved Skin Quality with a Novel Topical Body Serum: Distal Thighs and Back of Hands.

Journal of cosmetic dermatology·2026
Same author

Dual 1550-nm Erbium Glass Fiber and 1927-nm Thulium Fiber Non-ablative Fractional Laser System Treatment in Patients With Skin of Color: A Review of Clinical Studies and Unmet Needs.

Lasers in surgery and medicine·2026
Same author

Consensus Panel Recommendations for Optimizing Use of a Contact-Cooled 1726 nm Laser for the Treatment of Acne.

Journal of cosmetic dermatology·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 19, 2026

Enhancement of Facial Rejuvenation Through a Combination of 1565 nm Non-Ablative Fractional Laser with 30% Supramolecular Salicylic Acid
03:47

Enhancement of Facial Rejuvenation Through a Combination of 1565 nm Non-Ablative Fractional Laser with 30% Supramolecular Salicylic Acid

Published on: September 27, 2024

Ablative and fractional ablative lasers.

Lori A Brightman1, Jeremy A Brauer, Robert Anolik

  • 1Laser & Skin Surgery Center of New York, 317 East 34th Street, New York, NY 10016, USA. lbrightman@laserskinsurgery.com

Dermatologic Clinics
|October 24, 2009
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Fractional laser resurfacing offers a compelling alternative to fully ablative treatments for aesthetic enhancement. This nonsurgical approach balances significant clinical outcomes with a more favorable side effect profile and reduced downtime.

More Related Videos

Using a 1064-nm Picosecond Neodymium-Doped Yttrium Aluminum Garnet Laser for Periorbital Hyperpigmentation
04:43

Using a 1064-nm Picosecond Neodymium-Doped Yttrium Aluminum Garnet Laser for Periorbital Hyperpigmentation

Published on: May 23, 2025

Deep and Spatially Controlled Volume Ablations using a Two-Photon Microscope in the Zebrafish Gastrula
09:50

Deep and Spatially Controlled Volume Ablations using a Two-Photon Microscope in the Zebrafish Gastrula

Published on: July 15, 2021

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 19, 2026

Enhancement of Facial Rejuvenation Through a Combination of 1565 nm Non-Ablative Fractional Laser with 30% Supramolecular Salicylic Acid
03:47

Enhancement of Facial Rejuvenation Through a Combination of 1565 nm Non-Ablative Fractional Laser with 30% Supramolecular Salicylic Acid

Published on: September 27, 2024

Using a 1064-nm Picosecond Neodymium-Doped Yttrium Aluminum Garnet Laser for Periorbital Hyperpigmentation
04:43

Using a 1064-nm Picosecond Neodymium-Doped Yttrium Aluminum Garnet Laser for Periorbital Hyperpigmentation

Published on: May 23, 2025

Deep and Spatially Controlled Volume Ablations using a Two-Photon Microscope in the Zebrafish Gastrula
09:50

Deep and Spatially Controlled Volume Ablations using a Two-Photon Microscope in the Zebrafish Gastrula

Published on: July 15, 2021

Area of Science:

  • Dermatology
  • Aesthetic Medicine
  • Laser Technology

Background:

  • Nonsurgical laser resurfacing has evolved significantly since the 1980s.
  • Key technologies include ablative, nonablative, and fractional ablative lasers.
  • These methods differ in thermal damage, efficacy, downtime, and side effects.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the advancements in nonsurgical laser resurfacing technologies.
  • To compare the efficacy, downtime, and side effect profiles of different laser approaches.
  • To highlight the growing importance of fractional laser resurfacing.

Main Methods:

  • Review of existing research and technological advancements in laser resurfacing.
  • Comparative analysis of ablative, nonablative, and fractional ablative laser technologies.
  • Evaluation of clinical outcomes, patient recovery, and safety profiles.

Main Results:

  • Nonablative lasers offer mild improvements suitable for specific patient groups.
  • Fractional laser resurfacing demonstrates significant clinical outcomes.
  • Fractional lasers provide a more favorable side effect profile and reduced recovery time compared to fully ablative treatments.

Conclusions:

  • Fractional laser resurfacing is an increasingly attractive option for aesthetic enhancement.
  • It offers a favorable balance between efficacy, safety, and recovery.
  • Technological advancements continue to drive improvements in laser resurfacing treatments.