Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 19, 2026

A Model for Epilepsy of Infectious Etiology using Theiler's Murine Encephalomyelitis Virus
Published on: June 23, 2022
EXPERIMENTAL ENCEPHALITIS : SOME FACTORS AFFECTING INFECTION WITH CERTAIN NEUROTROPIC VIRUSES
1Department of Animal and Plant Pathology of The Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research, Princeton, New Jersey.
Abstract:
The action on mice of several neurotropic viruses was studied with reference to factors which influence infection. With pseudorabies virus, section of the sciatic nerve with inoculation into the ipsilateral foot pad significantly retarded the speed of infection. The virus ascended other nerves of the leg, but at a slower rate. It would appear that the number of nerve fibers available for passage may play a rôle in the speed with which infection occurs with this virus. When pseudorabies virus was inoculated into an area of inflammation its effects were markedly lessened. Similar experiments with unmodified equine encephalomyelitis virus which, unlike pseudorabies, does not ascend along local nerves, showed no impedance of infection. Brain trauma did not change the rate of infection with the viruses of St. Louis encephalitis, herpes, or pseudorabies. But intraperitoneal injection of glycerine, followed by intramuscular inoculation of St. Louis virus, resulted in marked facilitation of infection, as already remarked of fixed equine encephalomyelitis virus. This phenomenon did not occur with pseudorabies or herpes. In contrast to certain other viruses, pseudorabies and herpes viruses were only slightly more effective in young mice than in adults. With St. Louis virus, as with fixed equine encephalomyelitis viruses, inoculation into the eye or nose was far more effective than other peripheral routes. This was not the case with pseudorabies. Herpes, however, also showed greater sensitivity of the intraocular route. After injection into the eye, St. Louis and fixed equine encephalomyelitis viruses invaded the optic pathway, while herpes and pseudorabies avoided the optic fibers and attacked the trigeminal nerve. These phenomena are discussed in the light of cellufugal and cellupetal progression of viruses. The similarities in the action of fixed equine encephalomyelitis and St. Louis encephalitis viruses are discussed and contrasted with herpes and pseudorabies.
Insights
Nerve fiber availability and inflammation impact neurotropic virus infection speed in mice. Glycerine facilitates St. Louis virus infection, while eye inoculation is most effective for some viruses.
Area of Science:
- Neurovirology
- Infectious Disease Pathogenesis
Background:
- Neurotropic viruses infect the nervous system, with their spread influenced by various host and viral factors.
- Understanding viral entry and transport mechanisms is crucial for developing effective countermeasures.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate factors influencing the speed and route of infection for several neurotropic viruses in a mouse model.
- To elucidate the differential pathways and mechanisms of viral neuroinvasion.
Main Methods:
- Inoculation of mice with pseudorabies virus, equine encephalomyelitis virus, St. Louis encephalitis virus, and herpes virus.
- Manipulation of infection sites (e.g., sciatic nerve section, inflammation, intraperitoneal glycerine injection, ocular/nasal inoculation).
- Observation and comparison of viral spread patterns and infection rates.
Main Results:
- Sciatic nerve section and inflammation significantly altered pseudorabies virus infection speed.
- Glycerine facilitated St. Louis virus infection, unlike pseudorabies or herpes.
- Ocular and nasal routes were most effective for St. Louis and equine encephalomyelitis viruses, with distinct neural pathway invasion patterns observed for different viruses.
Conclusions:
- Nerve fiber availability and local inflammatory conditions influence neurotropic virus neuroinvasion.
- Viral entry routes and host factors like glycerine can significantly modulate infection dynamics.
- Different neurotropic viruses exhibit distinct neuroanatomical spread patterns, highlighting varied cellupetal and cellufugal progression mechanisms.
Related Concept Videos
Encephalitis ll: Pathophysiology
Encephalitis l: Introduction
Arboviral Encephalitis
Viral Meningitis

