Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 19, 2026

Performing Repeated Intraoperative Impedance Telemetry Measurements during Cochlear Implantation
06:54

Performing Repeated Intraoperative Impedance Telemetry Measurements during Cochlear Implantation

Published on: August 4, 2023

A method for removing cochlear implant artifact.

Lendra M Friesen1, Terence W Picton

  • 1Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. lendra.friesen@sunnybrook.ca

Hearing Research
|November 3, 2009
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Results with cochlear implantation in adults with speech recognition scores exceeding current criteria.

Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology·2011
Same author

Telephone use and the factors influencing it among cochlear implant patients.

Cochlear implants international·2011
Same author

Qualitative case studies of five cochlear implant recipients' experience with music.

Cochlear implants international·2011
Same author

The effects of unilateral cochlear implantation on the tinnitus handicap inventory and the influence on quality of life.

The Laryngoscope·2011
Same author

Temporal dynamics of selective attention during dichotic listening.

Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)·2009
Same author

Cognitive association formation in episodic memory: evidence from event-related potentials.

Neuropsychologia·2009
Same journal

Effects of early hearing deficits on olivocochlear efferent neuron morphology in mice.

Hearing research·2026
Same journal

Cochlear aging after synaptopathic noise: age-noise interactions in hair cell loss and axonal degeneration.

Hearing research·2026
Same journal

MERGE: Misophonia and emotion regulation in a guided experience sampling study.

Hearing research·2026
Same journal

Repopulating microglia recapitulate developmental characteristics during a period of auditory circuit recovery.

Hearing research·2026
Same journal

Deficits in tail-lift and air-righting reflexes in rats after ototoxicity associate with loss of vestibular type I hair cells.

Hearing research·2026
Same journal

Slc16a5 (MCT6) knockout induces sex-dependent changes in auditory function, hair cell viability and cochlear transcriptomic programs in the mouse.

Hearing research·2026
See all related articles

A novel subtraction technique effectively removes electrical artifact from cortical auditory evoked potentials (CAEPs) in cochlear implant (CI) users. This method isolates the physiological response, improving audiological assessments for CI recipients.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Audiology
  • Biomedical Engineering

Background:

  • Cortical auditory evoked potentials (CAEPs) are crucial for assessing auditory function.
  • Electrical artifact from cochlear implants (CIs) significantly hinders CAEP measurement.
  • Existing methods struggle to isolate neural responses from CI-generated artifact.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and validate a subtraction technique for removing electrical artifact from CI-generated CAEPs.
  • To assess the efficacy of varying interstimulus intervals (ISIs) in artifact reduction.
  • To confirm the feasibility of artifact-free N1-P2 response measurement in CI users.

Main Methods:

  • Recorded N1-P2 responses using speech syllables, tones, and pulse trains.
  • Employed varying interstimulus intervals (ISIs) including random and fixed durations (0.5-4s).

More Related Videos

Robotic Cochlear Implantation for Direct Cochlear Access
08:06

Robotic Cochlear Implantation for Direct Cochlear Access

Published on: June 16, 2022

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 19, 2026

Performing Repeated Intraoperative Impedance Telemetry Measurements during Cochlear Implantation
06:54

Performing Repeated Intraoperative Impedance Telemetry Measurements during Cochlear Implantation

Published on: August 4, 2023

Robotic Cochlear Implantation for Direct Cochlear Access
08:06

Robotic Cochlear Implantation for Direct Cochlear Access

Published on: June 16, 2022

  • Utilized a subtraction method comparing CAEPs from short and long ISIs in cochlear implant listeners.
  • Main Results:

    • N1-P2 response amplitudes generally increased with longer ISIs.
    • Difference waveforms were largest in homogeneous and random-stimulus blocks compared to random-ISI blocks.
    • The subtraction technique effectively eliminated electrical artifact in cochlear implant users.

    Conclusions:

    • The proposed subtraction technique is a feasible and effective method for removing electrical artifact from CAEPs in CI users.
    • This technique enables clearer measurement of the N1-P2 response, enhancing audiological evaluation.
    • Further research can refine ISI parameters for optimal artifact removal and physiological response isolation.