Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

RNA Structure01:23

RNA Structure

Overview
The basic structure of RNA consists of a five-carbon sugar and one of four nitrogenous bases. Although most RNA is single-stranded, it can form complex secondary and tertiary structures. Such structures play essential roles in the regulation of transcription and translation.
Different Types of RNA Have the Same Basic Structure
There are three main types of ribonucleic acid (RNA): messenger RNA (mRNA), transfer RNA (tRNA), and ribosomal RNA (rRNA). All three RNA types consist of a...
RNA Structure01:19

RNA Structure

The basic structure of RNA consists of a string of ribonucleotides attached by phosphodiester bonds. Although most RNA is single-stranded, it can form complex secondary and tertiary structures. Such structures play essential roles in the regulation of transcription and translation.
Different Types of RNA Have the Same Basic Structure
There are three main types of ribonucleic acid (RNA) involved in protein synthesis: messenger RNA (mRNA), transfer RNA (tRNA), and ribosomal RNA (rRNA). All three...
RNA Structure01:23

RNA Structure

Overview
The basic structure of RNA consists of a five-carbon sugar and one of four nitrogenous bases. Although most RNA is single-stranded, it can form complex secondary and tertiary structures. Such structures play essential roles in the regulation of transcription and translation.
Different Types of RNA Have the Same Basic Structure
There are three main types of ribonucleic acid (RNA): messenger RNA (mRNA), transfer RNA (tRNA), and ribosomal RNA (rRNA). All three RNA types consist of a...
RNA Stability01:53

RNA Stability

Intact DNA strands can be found in fossils, while scientists sometimes struggle to keep RNA intact under laboratory conditions. The structural variations between RNA and DNA underlie the differences in their stability and longevity. Because DNA is double-stranded, it is inherently more stable. The single-stranded structure of RNA is less stable but also more flexible and can form weak internal bonds. Additionally, most RNAs in the cell are relatively short, while DNA can be up to 250 million...
RNA Stability01:53

RNA Stability

Intact DNA strands can be found in fossils, while scientists sometimes struggle to keep RNA intact under laboratory conditions. The structural variations between RNA and DNA underlie the differences in their stability and longevity. Because DNA is double-stranded, it is inherently more stable. The single-stranded structure of RNA is less stable but also more flexible and can form weak internal bonds. Additionally, most RNAs in the cell are relatively short, while DNA can be up to 250 million...
Nucleic Acid Structure01:25

Nucleic Acid Structure

The pentose sugar in DNA is deoxyribose, while in RNA the pentose sugar is ribose. The difference between the sugars is the presence of the hydroxyl group on the ribose's second carbon and a hydrogen on the deoxyribose's second carbon. The phosphate residue attaches to the hydroxyl group of the 5′ carbon of one sugar and the hydroxyl group of the 3′ carbon of the sugar of the next nucleotide, which forms  a 5′ to 3′ phosphodiester linkage.
DNA Structure
DNA has a double-helix structure. The...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Motifs in SARS-CoV-2 evolution.

RNA (New York, N.Y.)·2023
Same author

Lipschitz continuity under toric equivalence for asynchronous Boolean networks.

Chaos (Woodbury, N.Y.)·2023
Same author

RNA Secondary Structures with Given Motif Specification: Combinatorics and Algorithms.

Bulletin of mathematical biology·2023
Same author

The energy-spectrum of bicompatible sequences.

Algorithms for molecular biology : AMB·2021
Same author

Multiscale Feedback Loops in SARS-CoV-2 Viral Evolution.

Journal of computational biology : a journal of computational molecular cell biology·2020
Same author

On an enhancement of RNA probing data using information theory.

Algorithms for molecular biology : AMB·2020
Same journal

Effects of Seasonal Births and Predation on Disease Spread.

Bulletin of mathematical biology·2026
Same journal

Identifiability, Sensitivity, and Genetic Algorithms in Bacterial Biofilm Selection Models.

Bulletin of mathematical biology·2026
Same journal

Slow Evolution Towards Generalism in a Model of Variable Dietary Range.

Bulletin of mathematical biology·2026
Same journal

CBINN: Cancer Biology-Informed Neural Network for Unknown Parameter Estimation and Missing Physics Identification.

Bulletin of mathematical biology·2026
Same journal

A Cost-Sensitive Behavioral Modeling Analysis of the Early Identification and Control of Infectious Diseases.

Bulletin of mathematical biology·2026
Same journal

Tracking Dynamics of Superspreading Through Contacts, Exposures, and Transmissions in Edge-Based Network Epidemics.

Bulletin of mathematical biology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 19, 2026

Probing RNA Structure with Dimethyl Sulfate Mutational Profiling with Sequencing In Vitro and in Cells
10:34

Probing RNA Structure with Dimethyl Sulfate Mutational Profiling with Sequencing In Vitro and in Cells

Published on: December 9, 2022

Irreducibility in RNA structures.

Emma Y Jin1, Christian M Reidys

  • 1Center for Combinatorics, LPMC-TJKLC, Nankai University, Tianjin, People's Republic of China.

Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
|November 6, 2009
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This paper examines the complexity of RNA shapes by identifying irreducible substructures. The researchers compare random RNA shapes with those predicted to have the lowest energy. They find that the largest irreducible part usually contains nearly all the RNA building blocks, which helps explain how these molecules fold into their final shapes.

Keywords:
molecular foldingpseudoknotsthermodynamicsbioinformatics

Frequently Asked Questions

More Related Videos

Comparative RNA Structure Analysis of Nascent and Mature Transcripts in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
09:12

Comparative RNA Structure Analysis of Nascent and Mature Transcripts in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Published on: February 27, 2026

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 19, 2026

Probing RNA Structure with Dimethyl Sulfate Mutational Profiling with Sequencing In Vitro and in Cells
10:34

Probing RNA Structure with Dimethyl Sulfate Mutational Profiling with Sequencing In Vitro and in Cells

Published on: December 9, 2022

Comparative RNA Structure Analysis of Nascent and Mature Transcripts in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
09:12

Comparative RNA Structure Analysis of Nascent and Mature Transcripts in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Published on: February 27, 2026

Area of Science:

  • Computational biology and RNA structure analysis
  • Bioinformatics and irreducibility in RNA structures

Background:

No prior work had resolved the full complexity of irreducible components within diverse RNA architectures. Researchers often struggle to categorize how specific contact patterns influence molecular stability. It was already known that secondary and pseudoknot configurations represent distinct folding challenges. That uncertainty drove interest in defining the mathematical boundaries of these structures. Prior research has shown that folding kinetics depend heavily on the internal arrangement of base pairs. This gap motivated a deeper look at how substructure size relates to thermodynamic predictions. Scientists previously lacked a unified framework to compare random versus minimum free energy arrangements. That limitation hindered our understanding of how these molecules reach their functional states.

Purpose Of The Study:

The aim of this study is to investigate the concept of irreducibility within diverse RNA structures. Researchers seek to clarify how structural complexity influences the folding process of these biological molecules. The study addresses the need to distinguish between random configurations and those predicted by minimum free energy models. This work explores the differences between standard secondary folds and more intricate pseudoknot arrangements. The authors intend to provide a mathematical analysis of irreducible substructures to better understand their role in molecular stability. They focus on identifying the locations and sizes of these components to reveal underlying patterns. The investigation is motivated by the desire to link structural properties to the time required for folding. This research establishes a framework for evaluating the complexity of these essential biological polymers.

Main Methods:

The review approach involves a systematic examination of abstract contact patterns across different RNA configurations. Investigators utilize mathematical modeling to contrast random arrangements with minimum free energy predictions. The team computes various distributions to quantify the prevalence of irreducible elements. They parameterize these findings using the maximal count of mutually crossing arcs. Researchers also incorporate the minimal stack size as a variable for structural classification. This methodology allows for a rigorous comparison between secondary folds and pseudoknot architectures. The approach focuses on identifying the largest irreducible components within these diverse molecular models. Statistical analysis supports the evaluation of how these substructures influence folding behaviors.

Main Results:

Key findings from the literature indicate that the largest irreducible substructure is typically unique and encompasses almost all nucleotides. The researchers observe that this component size serves as the primary factor influencing folding time for minimum free energy configurations. Their data reveals significant differences in the distribution of irreducible substructures when comparing random versus minimum free energy models. The analysis shows that these patterns vary based on the maximal number of mutually crossing arcs. The study quantifies the locations and sizes of these elements using specific parameters like minimal stack size. Results demonstrate that pseudoknot structures exhibit distinct irreducible characteristics compared to simpler secondary folds. The authors report that the largest substructure consistently dominates the overall molecular architecture. These findings provide a quantitative basis for understanding the structural complexity inherent in these biological molecules.

Conclusions:

The authors propose that the largest irreducible substructure typically exists as a unique entity within the molecule. Their analysis suggests that this component encompasses nearly the entire sequence of nucleotides. These findings imply that the size of this substructure serves as a primary determinant for folding duration. The researchers demonstrate that minimum free energy configurations exhibit distinct structural properties compared to random models. This synthesis highlights how mathematical parameters like crossing arcs influence overall molecular complexity. The study provides a clearer picture of the relationship between structural irreducibility and thermodynamic stability. These results offer a basis for future investigations into the kinetics of RNA folding. The work confirms that structural constraints play a major role in shaping the final configuration of these biological polymers.

The researchers propose that the largest irreducible substructure acts as the primary factor governing folding time. This component is typically unique and contains nearly all nucleotides within the molecule, contrasting with smaller, fragmented arrangements found in random models.

The study utilizes parameters such as the maximal number of mutually crossing arcs, denoted as k-1, and the minimal size of stacks, represented by sigma, to categorize and measure these complex contact patterns.

The authors define these structures as abstract contact patterns. This approach is necessary to mathematically analyze both standard secondary folds and more complex pseudoknot arrangements within a unified framework.

The researchers employ these distributions to map the locations and sizes of irreducible elements. This data allows for a direct comparison between random configurations and those predicted by minimum free energy models.

The team measures the size of the largest irreducible substructure. They observe that this measurement is significantly larger in minimum free energy configurations compared to random structural models.

The authors suggest that their findings regarding the uniqueness of the largest irreducible substructure provide a new perspective on the folding efficiency of biological molecules.