Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 18, 2026

Assessment and Evaluation of the High Risk Neonate: The NICU Network Neurobehavioral Scale
Published on: August 25, 2014
Quality-of-life considerations in substitute decision-making for severely disabled neonates: the problem of
1Department of Philosophy, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC V8W3P4, Canada. ekluge@uvic.ca
Insights
Decisions for severely disabled neonates require new quality-of-life tools. Current methods fail to distinguish between developing and developed awareness, hindering best-interest assessments for infants requiring lifelong medical care.
Area of Science:
- Medical Ethics
- Neonatal Care
- Bioethics
Background:
- Substitute decision-makers face complex choices for severely disabled neonates requiring intensive medical support.
- Current decision-making relies on the best-interests criterion, heavily influenced by quality-of-life considerations.
Purpose of the Study:
- To highlight the inadequacy of existing quality-of-life measures for neonates with developing awareness.
- To argue for the necessity of new assessment tools that differentiate awareness levels in ethical decision-making.
Main Methods:
- Conceptual analysis of the best-interests criterion in neonatal care.
- Ethical examination of quality-of-life assessments for patients with varying levels of awareness.
Main Results:
- Existing quality-of-life considerations are ethically and logically insufficient for neonates.
- The distinction between developing and developed awareness is currently ignored in clinical practice.
Conclusions:
- A significant gap exists in ethical frameworks for neonatal decision-making.
- New tools are needed to meaningfully apply the best-interest criterion for neonates with developing awareness.
Abstract:
Substitute decision-makers for severely disabled neonates who can be kept alive but who will require constant medical interventions and will die at the latest in their teens are faced with a difficult decision when trying to decide whether to keep the infant alive. By and large, the primary focus of their decision-making centers on what is in the best interests of the newborn. The best-interests criterion, in turn, is importantly conditioned by quality-of-life considerations. However, the concept of quality of life is logically and ethically different for patients with a developing as opposed to a developed awareness. Unfortunately, this difference is ignored by current quality-of-life considerations, there are no quality-of-life measures that take this difference into account, and decision-making proceeds entirely without acknowledging this fact. This note outlines why this is a problem and why there is a need for a new set of tools that incorporates this distinction if the substitute decision-makers are to apply the best-interest criterion in a meaningful way.
Related Concept Videos
Ethical Issues
Ethical Concerns in Healthcare:
Ethical Dilemmas II
Subconsciousness and No Awareness
An illustrative example of subconscious processing is its role in problem-solving. Often, individuals...
Intellectual Disability
Ethical Dilemmas I
Let us explore some examples to understand the potentially complex moral decisions nurses face.
Take the case of caring for minors, particularly in areas related to reproductive...
Planning Nursing Care I

