Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 18, 2026

08:27
Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
Published on: September 27, 2019
Cross-cultural validation of the Work Values Scale EVAT using multi-group confirmatory factor analysis and
Luis M Arciniega1, Luis González, Vítor Soares
1Instituto Tecnológico Autónoma de México, Mexico. larciniega@itam.mx
The Spanish Journal of Psychology
|November 11, 2009
Summary
The Work Values Scale EVAT, measuring work values, has demonstrated cross-cultural validity across Spanish, Portuguese, and Italian versions. This ensures its reliable use in diverse linguistic and cultural work contexts.
Area of Science:
- Psychology
- Organizational Behavior
- Cross-Cultural Psychology
Background:
- The Work Values Scale EVAT (Escala de Valores hacia el Trabajo) was developed in 2000.
- It operationalizes Schwartz's Theory of basic higher-order values within work contexts.
- Previous use in Mexican and Spanish samples indicated adequate psychometric properties.
Purpose of the Study:
- To establish the cross-cultural validity of the Work Values Scale EVAT.
- To confirm the equivalence of Spanish, Portuguese, and Italian versions of the scale.
- To support the scale's application in international research.
Main Methods:
- Translation of the EVAT scale into Portuguese and Italian.
- Administration of the translated scales to large samples in Portugal and Italy.
- Psychometric analysis to assess cross-cultural validity and equivalence.
Main Results:
- The Portuguese and Italian translations of the EVAT scale were successfully developed.
- Large-scale studies in Portugal and Italy yielded data for analysis.
- Results indicate that the Spanish, Portuguese, and Italian versions of the EVAT scale are equivalent.
Conclusions:
- The Work Values Scale EVAT demonstrates cross-cultural validity.
- The Spanish, Portuguese, and Italian versions are psychometrically equivalent.
- The EVAT scale is suitable for use across these linguistic and cultural groups in work value research.
Related Concept Videos
Reliability and Validity
Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.
Cross-Sectional Research
In cross-sectional research, a researcher compares multiple segments of the population at the same time. If they were interested in people's dietary habits, the researcher might directly compare different groups of people by age. Instead of following a group of people for 20 years to see how their dietary habits changed from decade to decade, the researcher would study a group of 20-year-old individuals and compare them to a group of 30-year-old individuals and a group of 40-year-old...
Self-Evaluation Maintenance Model
The Self-Evaluation Maintenance (SEM) model offers a psychological framework to understand how individuals’ self-esteem is influenced by the achievements of others, particularly those with whom they share close personal bonds. The SEM model operates when personal rather than social identity guides individuals. Central to this model is the notion that individuals have an inherent desire to preserve a favorable self-image, which is continuously shaped by interpersonal comparisons and...
Self-Report Tests of Personality
Self-report inventories are objective personality assessments that use multiple-choice items or numbered scales, typically ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). They are often called Likert scales after Rensis Likert. These inventories are widely used due to their ease of administration and cost-effectiveness. One of the most prominent examples is the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI), initially developed in the 1940s to assess abnormal personality traits.
Confirmation Biases
The confirmation bias is the tendency to focus on information that confirms our existing beliefs and ignore information that is inconsistent with our expectations. For example, if you think that your professor is not very nice, you notice all of the instances of rude behavior exhibited by the professor while ignoring the countless pleasant interactions he is involved in on a daily basis. Have you ever fallen prey to the confirmation bias, either as the source or target of such bias?
Self-Esteem and Culture
Self-esteem, a core psychological construct, is intricately shaped by cultural context and varies significantly between collectivist and individualistic societies. In collectivist cultures such as Japan, self-esteem tends to be flexible, context-sensitive, and influenced by relationships. A Japanese student, for instance, may show restraint in formal settings like school but behave more openly among close friends, reflecting the flexible and dynamic nature of self-concept in such...