Related Experiment Videos
Therapeutic interventions and success in risk factor control for secondary prevention of stroke
Jose Alvarez-Sabin1, Manuel Quintana, Miguel Angel Hernandez-Presa
1Unitat Neurovascular vall d' Hebron, Neurology Service Hospital vall d' Hebron, Barcelona, Spain.
Insights
Achieving secondary prevention goals for vascular events is challenging, particularly for ischemic stroke (IS) patients compared to coronary artery disease (CAD) patients. Improved strategies are urgently needed to control risk factors in these high-risk populations.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Neurology
- Public Health
Background:
- Secondary prevention of vascular events is crucial for patients with ischemic stroke (IS) and coronary artery disease (CAD).
- Adherence to preventive therapeutic goals aims to reduce recurrent cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events.
- Current management strategies may not be fully optimizing risk factor control in these patient populations.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the success rates in achieving preventive therapeutic goals for secondary prevention in patients with IS.
- To compare these success rates with those achieved in patients with CAD.
- To identify factors influencing the achievement of therapeutic objectives.
Main Methods:
- An observational, multicenter, case-control study involving 5458 patients (4098 with IS, 1360 with CAD) across 1444 primary health centers in Spain.
- Predefined preventive therapeutic objectives based on American Heart Association guidelines were assessed.
- Demographic data, vascular risk factors, and achievement of objectives were recorded and compared between IS and CAD groups.
Main Results:
- Less than 25% of patients with hypertension, diabetes, or dyslipidemia achieved their recommended therapeutic objectives.
- Success rates for hypertension, dyslipidemia, and abdominal obesity control were significantly lower in IS patients compared to CAD patients.
- Only 3.3% of IS patients and 5.6% of CAD patients had all risk factors under control; CAD presence, older age, and fewer risk factors predicted full control.
Conclusions:
- Achievement of preventive therapeutic objectives for secondary vascular event prevention is notably low, especially in ischemic stroke patients.
- There is a critical need for enhanced strategies to improve risk factor control and secondary prevention outcomes.
- Optimizing secondary prevention in IS and CAD patients requires targeted interventions to improve adherence and goal attainment.
Objective:
We sought to evaluate the success rates in achieving preventive therapeutic goals in patients who experienced an ischemic stroke (IS) and compare them with those achieved in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD).
Methods:
This was an observational multicenter case-control study (3 patients with IS and one control subject with CAD) performed in 1444 primary health centers in Spain. Preventive therapeutic objectives according to American Heart Association guidelines were predefined. Demographic data, vascular risk factors, and success/failure in achievement of objectives were recorded and compared between patients with IS and CAD.
Results:
A total of 5458 patients were included, 4098 (75.1%) had IS and 1360 (24.9%) had CAD. Although more than 90% of patients with hypertension, diabetes, or dyslipidemia were under specific drug regimens, only about 25% achieved the recommended therapeutic objective for each risk factor. Success rate was especially low among patients with IS compared with CAD: hypertension (23.8% v 27.2%; P = .028); dyslipidemia (13.6% v 20.3%; P < .001); and abdominal obesity (49.1% v 54.6%; P = .002). The only objective widely achieved in both groups was the use of antithrombotic drugs in atrial fibrillation (97.2% v 94.7%; P = .125). Only 3.3% of patients with IS had all risk factors under control, compared with 5.6% of those with CAD (P = .006). For all patients, multivariate logistic regression model showed that independent predictors of full risk factor control were: presence of CAD as compared with IS (odds ratio [OR] 2.11; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.35-3.29; P = .001), older age (OR 1.02; 95% CI 1.00-1.04; P = .028), and having less than 3 risk factors (OR 16.98; 95% CI 9.02-31.97; P < .001).
Conclusions:
Success in achieving preventive therapeutic objectives for secondary prevention of vascular events is low, especially among patients with IS. There is an urgent need to devise strategies to improve risk factor control.
Related Concept Videos
Atherosclerosis III: Management
Atherosclerosis IV: Nursing Management
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Coronary Artery Disease IV: Preventive Measures
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care