Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 18, 2026

Surgical Technique of the 3-Dimensional-printed Personalized Hip Implant for the Treatment of Canine Hip Dysplasia
Published on: April 19, 2024
Developmental dysplasia of the hip: universal or selective ultrasound screening?
1Department of Neonatology, National University Hospital, 5 Lower Kent Ridge Road, Singapore 119074. Lee_Jiun@nuhs.edu.sg
Insights
Developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) screening requires careful consideration. Selective ultrasound screening for infants with risk factors is more effective and cost-efficient than universal screening.
Area of Science:
- Pediatrics
- Orthopedics
- Medical Imaging
Background:
- Developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) evolves during infancy, making early, perfectly accurate screening challenging.
- Current clinical screening methods for DDH may miss a significant number of cases requiring surgery.
- There is ongoing debate regarding the optimal screening strategy for DDH due to limited epidemiological data.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review and compare different screening strategies for developmental dysplasia of the hip.
- To evaluate the effectiveness and cost-efficiency of universal versus selective ultrasound screening for DDH.
- To provide guidance for healthcare systems considering DDH screening protocols.
Main Methods:
- Literature review on developmental dysplasia of the hip screening methods.
- Analysis of universal versus selective ultrasound screening approaches.
- Evaluation of reported outcomes, including detection rates and surgical reductions.
Main Results:
- Universal ultrasound screening for DDH can lead to significant reductions in late surgical interventions but is associated with high false positive rates and costs.
- Selective ultrasound screening, targeting high-risk infants, has shown similar reductions in surgery for late DDH.
- The effectiveness and cost-benefit analysis suggest universal screening is not generally cost-effective.
Conclusions:
- Neither universal nor selective screening at birth guarantees high sensitivity and specificity for DDH.
- Selective ultrasound screening for infants with identified risk factors appears to be a more pragmatic approach.
- Healthcare systems should carefully weigh the pros and cons, favoring cost-effective strategies like selective screening over universal screening for DDH.
Abstract:
Developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) is an intriguing condition that evolves during infancy. It would be thus foolhardy to expect a screening tool at birth to be both highly sensitive and specific. Uncertainty regarding an optimal screening method is compounded by a general lack of sound epidemiological data. Clinical screening remains widely used. Some reports estimated that it did not pick up 60% of children who eventually needed surgery. Ultrasonography, it was hoped, would improve detection rates. There are 2 approaches to ultrasound; universal screening, which is adopted by some European countries, or selective screening of high risk infants. The problems with universal ultrasound screening are high false positive rates and high costs. The benefit was a possible 6- to 10-fold reduction in surgery for late DDH. Similar reductions though had also been reported if ultrasound was used selectively for infants with clinical and historical risk factors. A literature review on this topic is presented. There are pros and cons for both screening strategies. This is reflected in the different protocols that exist among various countries. For healthcare systems that are considering their options, universal ultrasound screening is generally not cost-effective and should not be the preferred screening strategy.
Related Concept Videos
Imaging Studies II: Ultrasonography
Ultrasonography
During an ultrasonography procedure, a handheld device called a...
