Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 18, 2026

03:56
A Two-Step Method for Percutaneous Transhepatic Choledochoscopic Lithotomy
Published on: September 13, 2022
Optimized transumbilical endoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized comparison of two procedures
Hai Hu1, Jiangfan Zhu, Weidong Wang
1Department of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Tongji University Affiliated Shanghai East Hospital, 150 Jimo Road, Pudong New District, Shanghai, 200120 People's Republic of China. huhailc@sina.com
Surgical Endoscopy
|November 14, 2009
Summary
The two-trocar (TT) transumbilical endoscopic surgery (TUES) technique is faster and less painful than the single-trocar (ST) TUES method for gallbladder disease. This minimally invasive approach improves surgical efficiency and patient recovery.
Area of Science:
- Minimally Invasive Surgery
- Surgical Techniques
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
Background:
- Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) and transumbilical endoscopic surgery (TUES) represent advancements in minimally invasive surgery.
- The single-trocar (ST) technique for TUES was previously developed using a triple-channel trocar.
- The two-trocar (TT) technique was developed to further enhance surgical efficiency and reduce risks.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the clinical outcomes of the two-trocar (TT) and single-trocar (ST) transumbilical endoscopic surgery techniques.
- To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the optimized TT approach versus the established ST approach for cholecystectomy.
Main Methods:
- A randomized study involving 32 patients with chronic gallbladder disease undergoing cholecystectomy.
- Patients were assigned to either the TT technique (17 patients) or the ST technique (15 patients).
- The TT technique involved two 5-mm trocars in the umbilicus and one 2-mm trocar, while the ST technique used a single 15-mm triple-channel trocar.
Main Results:
- The mean operative time was significantly shorter for the TT technique (35.71 min) compared to the ST technique (125.25 min) (p < 0.001).
- Postoperative analgesic use was significantly lower in the TT group (0) versus the ST group (7) (p < 0.05).
- There was no significant difference in postoperative hospital stay between the two groups (p > 0.05).
Conclusions:
- The TT transumbilical approach is a faster and less painful alternative to the ST approach for cholecystectomy.
- Both techniques are based on the transumbilical approach, offering minimally invasive benefits.
- Cosmetic results were minimally different between the TT and ST techniques.