Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 18, 2026

Defining the Role Of Language in Infants' Object Categorization with Eye-tracking Paradigms
Published on: February 8, 2019
Comparing two attachment classification methods applied to preschool strange situations
Susan Spieker1, Patricia McKinsey Crittenden
1Center on Infant Mental Health & Development University of Washington, Box 357920 Seattle, WA 98195-7920, USA. spieker@u.washington.edu
Insights
This study found that two attachment classification methods, MacArthur (MAC) and Preschool Assessment of Attachment (PAA), showed only 50% agreement. The PAA method was more sensitive to demographic and child predictors than the MAC method.
Area of Science:
- Developmental Psychology
- Attachment Theory
- Child Behavior Assessment
Background:
- Attachment theory is crucial for understanding child development.
- The Strange Situation procedure is a key method for assessing attachment.
- Different classification systems exist, potentially leading to varied interpretations.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the MacArthur (MAC) and Preschool Assessment of Attachment (PAA) methods.
- To determine if MAC and PAA operationalize converging or diverging approaches to attachment.
- To examine the relationship between these classifications and child/family predictors and later outcomes.
Main Methods:
- Classified 306 preschool-aged children's Strange Situation behaviors using MAC and PAA.
- Analyzed agreement between the two classification methods.
- Examined associations with demographic, child, and family predictors.
- Investigated links between classifications and child outcomes in early elementary grades.
Main Results:
- MAC and PAA methods showed 50% agreement.
- Demographic, child, and family predictors explained 19% of PAA variance but none for MAC.
- Both methods associated with child outcomes, with PAA showing stronger links (12% vs. 5% variance).
- Some MAC associations contradicted hypotheses.
Conclusions:
- The MAC and PAA methods are sufficiently different, reflecting distinct theoretical understandings of attachment.
- PAA appears more sensitive to contextual factors than MAC.
- Findings have implications for clinical practice and highlight limitations in current attachment assessment measures.
Abstract:
This study compared two methods for classifying preschool-age children's behavior in the Strange Situation procedure, the MacArthur (MAC) and the Preschool Assessment of Attachment (PAA), to determine whether they operationalized converging or diverging approaches to attachment theory. Strange Situations of 306 randomly selected 3-year-old children and their mothers in the NICHD Study of Early Child Care and Youth Development were classified with the MAC and PAA. The methods showed 50% agreement. A block of seven demographic, child and family predictors was unrelated to MAC classifications, but accounted for 19% of the variance in PAA classifications. The MAC and PAA each had associations with some child outcomes in grades 1-5 (ages 6-10) totaling 5% and 12% of the variance respectively, but some of the MAC associations were counter to the hypothesis. The MAC and PAA were sufficiently different to reflect both different classificatory methods and different theoretical understandings of attachment. Results are discussed in terms of limitations of the sample and measures available to compare the two methods, and clinical implications.
More Related Videos
06:15Using the Visual World Paradigm to Study Sentence Comprehension in Mandarin-Speaking Children with Autism
Published on: October 3, 2018
05:35Experience is Instrumental in Tuning a Link Between Language and Cognition: Evidence from 6- to 7- Month-Old Infants' Object Categorization
Published on: April 19, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Attachment
Theory of Romantic Attachment in Adulthood
Naturalistic Observations
Attachment Styles
Classification of Systems-II
Classification of Systems-I
Homogeneity dictates that if an input x(t) is multiplied by a constant c, the output y(t) is multiplied by the same constant. Mathematically, this is expressed as: