Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 18, 2026

07:13
Measuring Active and Passive Tameness Separately in Mice
Published on: August 10, 2018
Measuring the effect of change in selection indices
1Department of Genetics, Trinity College, Dublin 2, Ireland. epcnnghm@tcd.ie
Journal of Dairy Science
|November 20, 2009
Summary
This study redefines relative emphasis in dairy cattle genetic selection, proposing a new metric based on economic value to accurately reflect trait contributions and avoid overstating changes in selection goals.
Area of Science:
- Animal Genetics
- Quantitative Genetics
- Dairy Cattle Breeding
Background:
- Dairy cattle genetic selection has evolved from production traits to include health, fertility, and functionality.
- Expanding selection goals involves incorporating additional measured phenotypic variates.
- Current methods for defining the relative emphasis of traits in selection goals may be imprecise.
Purpose of the Study:
- To propose a new, more accurate definition for the relative emphasis of target traits in genetic selection.
- To introduce a parallel statistic for measuring the relative contribution of each recorded phenotypic variate.
- To contrast the proposed measures with existing methods using United States Holstein data.
Main Methods:
- Proposed a new definition of relative emphasis based on the percentage of total economic value of genetic gain attributable to a specific trait.
- Developed a parallel statistic to measure the relative contribution of each phenotypic variate.
- Applied and contrasted these new measures with current methods using United States Holstein data.
Main Results:
- Current definitions of relative emphasis in dairy cattle genetic selection may overstate the net effect of changes.
- The proposed definition provides a more accurate measure of trait importance within selection goals.
- The new parallel statistic offers a clearer understanding of the contribution of individual phenotypic variates.
Conclusions:
- A revised definition of relative emphasis is crucial for accurately assessing genetic selection strategies in dairy cattle.
- The proposed economic value-based approach offers a more precise method for evaluating trait contributions.
- These new measures enhance the understanding and application of genetic selection for improved dairy cattle breeding.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Types of Selection
Natural selection influences the frequencies of particular alleles and phenotypes within populations in several different ways. Primarily, natural selection can be directional, stabilizing, or disruptive. Directional selection favors one extreme trait and shifts the population towards that phenotype while selecting against individuals displaying alternate traits. Stabilizing selection favors an intermediate trait with a narrow range of variation. Deviation from the optimal phenotype towards an...
Frequency-dependent Selection
When the fitness of a trait is influenced by how common it is (i.e., its frequency) relative to different traits within a population, this is referred to as frequency-dependent selection. Frequency-dependent selection may occur between species or within a single species. This type of selection can either be positive—with more common phenotypes having higher fitness—or negative, with rarer phenotypes conferring increased fitness.Positive Frequency-Dependent SelectionIn positive...
One-Way ANOVA: Equal Sample Sizes
One-Way ANOVA can be performed on three or more samples with equal or unequal sample sizes. When one-way ANOVA is performed on two datasets with samples of equal sizes, it can be easily observed that the computed F statistic is highly sensitive to the sample mean.
Different sample means can result in different values for the variance estimate: variance between samples. This is because the variance between samples is calculated as the product of the sample size and the variance between the...
Different sample means can result in different values for the variance estimate: variance between samples. This is because the variance between samples is calculated as the product of the sample size and the variance between the...
One-Way ANOVA: Unequal Sample Sizes
One-way ANOVA can be performed on three or more samples of unequal sizes. However, calculations get complicated when sample sizes are not always the same. So, while performing ANOVA with unequal samples size, the following equation is used:
Testing a Claim about Standard Deviation
A complete procedure to test a claim about population standard deviation or population variance is explained here.
The hypothesis testing for the claim of population standard deviation (or variance) requires the data and samples to be random and unbiased. The population distribution also must be normal. There is no specific requirement on the sample size as the estimation is based on the chi-square distribution.
As a first step, the hypothesis (null and alternative) concerning the claim about...
The hypothesis testing for the claim of population standard deviation (or variance) requires the data and samples to be random and unbiased. The population distribution also must be normal. There is no specific requirement on the sample size as the estimation is based on the chi-square distribution.
As a first step, the hypothesis (null and alternative) concerning the claim about...
Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks
Friedman's Two-Way Analysis of Variance by Ranks is a nonparametric test designed to identify differences across multiple test attempts when traditional assumptions of normality and equal variances do not apply. Unlike conventional ANOVA, which requires normally distributed data with equal variances, Friedman's test is ideal for ordinal or non-normally distributed data, making it particularly useful for analyzing dependent samples, such as matched subjects over time or repeated measures from...

