Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 18, 2026

08:06
Testing for Metacognitive Responding Using an Odor-based Delayed Match-to-Sample Test in Rats
Published on: June 18, 2018
Development of a short olfactory test based on the Connecticut Test (CCCRC)
1Rhinology Unit, Fundación Hospital Alcorcón, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Madrid, Spain. atoledano@fhalcorcon.es
Rhinology
|November 26, 2009
Summary
The new Connecticut Smell Test (CST) is a valid, quick, and easy olfactory assessment for nasal polyposis patients. It demonstrates high sensitivity and negative predictive value, offering a cost-effective alternative to existing tests.
Area of Science:
- Otolaryngology
- Diagnostic Test Development
- Olfactory Function Assessment
Background:
- Nasal polyposis significantly impacts olfactory function.
- Accurate and efficient smell testing is crucial for diagnosis and management.
- Existing tests may be time-consuming or costly.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop and validate the Connecticut Smell Test (CST), a brief olfactory assessment tool.
- To evaluate the CST's performance against the Pocket Smell Test (PST).
- To determine the CST's clinical utility, including cost and time efficiency.
Main Methods:
- A prospective patient-based study comparing CST and PST in 40 nasal polyposis patients.
- Assessment of sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value.
- Evaluation of unit cost, performance time, and patient-reported ease of use.
Main Results:
- CST achieved 93.3% sensitivity and 76% specificity.
- Negative predictive value was high at 95%, with a positive predictive value of 70%.
- CST cost €0.65 per test, took 34 seconds, and was rated easy to perform by over 96% of patients.
Conclusions:
- The Connecticut Smell Test (CST) is a valid, rapid, and user-friendly tool for assessing smell in nasal polyposis.
- CST offers a cost-effective and efficient alternative for clinical olfactory evaluation.
- The test's high sensitivity and negative predictive value support its use in this patient population.

