Related Experiment Videos
Human patient simulators and interactive case studies: a comparative analysis of learning outcomes and student
Valerie Michele Howard1, Carl Ross, Ann M Mitchell
1Department of Nursing, Robert Morris University, Moon Township, PA 15108, USA. howardv@rmu.edu
Computers, Informatics, Nursing : CIN
|November 27, 2009
Summary
Human patient simulators significantly improve nursing student knowledge compared to interactive case studies. This study found simulators a valuable, favorably received educational intervention across different nursing programs.
Area of Science:
- Nursing Education
- Medical Simulation
Background:
- Human patient simulators offer innovative teaching but are costly.
- Evaluating the cost-effectiveness of simulation in nursing education is crucial.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the effectiveness of human patient simulators versus interactive case studies in nursing education.
- To assess student knowledge acquisition and satisfaction with simulation technology.
Main Methods:
- Quantitative, quasi-experimental, two-group pretest/posttest design.
- Sample included 49 students from baccalaureate, accelerated baccalaureate, and diploma nursing programs.
- Health Education Systems, Inc examinations and questionnaires were used for data collection.
Main Results:
- Students using human patient simulators scored significantly higher on posttest examinations.
- No significant differences in scores were observed among the three nursing program types.
- Student questionnaires indicated a favorable response to human patient simulators.
Conclusions:
- Human patient simulators are an effective educational intervention for enhancing nursing student knowledge.
- Simulation technology provides a valuable return on investment in nursing education.
- Favorable student reception suggests broad applicability of simulators in nursing curricula.
