Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Barriers to symptom disclosure and healthcare seeking among civilian aviation pilot trainees.

Journal of health psychology·2026
Same author

Parents' approval of their children playing high-risk sports.

Applied neuropsychology. Child·2025
Same author

Development and validation of a scale to assess the belief that 'age causes illness'.

Psychology & health·2024
Same author

The Importance of the Morel Emotional Numbing Test Instructions: A Diagnosis Threat Induction Study.

Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists·2023
Same author

Review of Studies on Incremental Validity of Assessment Measures Used in Psychological Assessment of Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder.

Assessment·2023
Same author

The missing piece in block design tasks: Resolving performance differences elicited by designs with identical stimulus parameters.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2022

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 18, 2026

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

Learning effects in the block design task: a stimulus parameter-based approach.

Joseph C Miller1, Joelle C Ruthig, April R Bradley

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of North Dakota, Grand Forks, ND 58202, USA. joseph.miller@und.nodak.edu

Psychological Assessment
|December 2, 2009
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Learning effects in cognitive tasks can be reduced by using novel test items. Presenting new stimuli matched for perceptual cohesiveness and set size uncertainty improves accuracy in assessing ability changes over time.

More Related Videos

Combined Shuttle-Box Training with Electrophysiological Cortex Recording and Stimulation as a Tool to Study Perception and Learning
08:43

Combined Shuttle-Box Training with Electrophysiological Cortex Recording and Stimulation as a Tool to Study Perception and Learning

Published on: October 22, 2015

The "Motor" in Implicit Motor Sequence Learning: A Foot-stepping Serial Reaction Time Task
10:39

The "Motor" in Implicit Motor Sequence Learning: A Foot-stepping Serial Reaction Time Task

Published on: May 3, 2018

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 18, 2026

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

Combined Shuttle-Box Training with Electrophysiological Cortex Recording and Stimulation as a Tool to Study Perception and Learning
08:43

Combined Shuttle-Box Training with Electrophysiological Cortex Recording and Stimulation as a Tool to Study Perception and Learning

Published on: October 22, 2015

The "Motor" in Implicit Motor Sequence Learning: A Foot-stepping Serial Reaction Time Task
10:39

The "Motor" in Implicit Motor Sequence Learning: A Foot-stepping Serial Reaction Time Task

Published on: May 3, 2018

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuropsychological Assessment

Background:

  • Learning effects can impact the accuracy of cognitive assessments.
  • Understanding factors influencing learning effects is crucial for reliable ability measurement.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess learning effects in the block design (BD) task.
  • To investigate the influence of perceptual cohesiveness (PC) and set size uncertainty (U) on learning.
  • To compare the impact of novel versus repeated test items on learning effects.

Main Methods:

  • Thirty-one students completed multiple block design (BD) task variations.
  • Stimulus parameters (PC and U) were systematically manipulated.
  • Regression analyses quantified learning slopes (growth factors).

Main Results:

  • Significant learning effects were observed across all conditions.
  • Learning slopes were highest for high uncertainty/high cohesiveness designs.
  • Novel test items reduced learning effects compared to repeated items.

Conclusions:

  • Repeated administration of novel, matched block design (BD) items enhances assessment accuracy.
  • This method offers a more reliable way to track changes in examinee abilities.
  • Implementation challenges for this assessment approach exist.