Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs01:15

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs

6
Body:Bioequivalence experimental study designs play a pivotal role in testing the effectiveness of various treatments. Key among these are the repeated measures, cross-over, carry-over, and Latin square designs. In the repeated measures design, each subject receives all treatments, allowing for temporal comparisons. This type of design is useful in reducing variability but requires careful planning to avoid bias.The cross-over design, an economical method, involves sequential administration of...
6
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs01:20

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs

5
Body:Bioequivalence experimental study designs are crucial methodologies used in evaluating and comparing the bioavailability of different drug products. These designs are categorized into various types: completely randomized, randomized block, repeated measures, cross and carry-over, and Latin square designs.Completely randomized designs involve randomly allocating treatments to all subjects participating in the experiment. This allocation is achieved by assigning unique random numbers to...
5

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Review of Studies on Incremental Validity of Assessment Measures Used in Psychological Assessment of Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder.

Assessment·2023
Same author

Preliminary Validation of the Global Neuropsychological Assessment in Alzheimer's Disease and Healthy Volunteers.

Assessment·2021
Same author

Premonitory Urge for Tics Scale (PUTS): replication and extension of psychometric properties in youth with chronic tic disorders (CTDs).

Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996)·2017
Same author

A pilot study examining the severity and outcome of the post-cardiac arrest syndrome: a comparative analysis of two geographically distinct hospitals.

Circulation·2012
Same author

Assessing the reliability of the Gambling Functional Assessment: Revised.

Journal of gambling studies·2011
Same author

Testing the construct validity of the gambling functional assessment-revised.

Behavior modification·2011

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 3, 2025

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons
07:13

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

Published on: November 9, 2018

11.1K

The missing piece in block design tasks: Resolving performance differences elicited by designs with identical

Joseph C Miller1, Jeremy M Raines2, Michael S Jowkar2

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of North Dakota, Box 8380, Grand Forks, ND, 58202, USA. joseph.miller@und.nodak.edu.

Attention, Perception & Psychophysics
|February 17, 2022
PubMed
Summary

Even when perceptual cohesiveness and response uncertainty are controlled, block design features impact test performance. Redundancy in adjacent blocks, not symmetry, was found to influence outcomes in this study.

Keywords:
Block design testGlobal symmetryLocal symmetryPerceptual cohesivenessUncertainty

More Related Videos

Revised and Neuroimaging-Compatible Versions of the Dual Task Screen
07:52

Revised and Neuroimaging-Compatible Versions of the Dual Task Screen

Published on: October 5, 2020

3.7K
Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues
07:34

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues

Published on: June 3, 2013

17.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 3, 2025

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons
07:13

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

Published on: November 9, 2018

11.1K
Revised and Neuroimaging-Compatible Versions of the Dual Task Screen
07:52

Revised and Neuroimaging-Compatible Versions of the Dual Task Screen

Published on: October 5, 2020

3.7K
Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues
07:34

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues

Published on: June 3, 2013

17.5K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Visual Perception
  • Human Factors Engineering

Background:

  • Previous research identified perceptual cohesiveness and response uncertainty as key block design variables affecting test performance.
  • Existing literature suggests that visually distinct designs should yield similar performance if these known parameters are constant.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate previously unidentified stimulus parameters influencing block design performance.
  • To control for known variables like cohesiveness and uncertainty to isolate novel factors.

Main Methods:

  • University undergraduates (n=65) were presented with block designs featuring zero cohesiveness and maximum uncertainty.
  • Designs were rotated in 90° increments, with block edges either cued or uncued.
  • Post hoc analysis involved coding designs for hypothesized parameters and conducting regression analysis.

Main Results:

  • Performance differences emerged between designs that appeared visually distinct, despite constant cohesiveness and uncertainty.
  • Regression analysis indicated that redundancy of adjacent blocks (coherent regions) reduced actual design uncertainty.
  • Local and global symmetry did not significantly predict performance beyond the effect of coherent regions.

Conclusions:

  • Block design performance is influenced by factors beyond perceptual cohesiveness and response uncertainty.
  • Redundancy in adjacent blocks is a critical, previously underestimated, stimulus parameter affecting test performance.
  • Understanding these nuanced stimulus contributions is vital for optimizing test design and performance evaluation.