Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 18, 2026

Dissociation of the Confounding Influences of Expectancy and Integrative Difficulty Residing in Anomalous Sentences in Event-related Potential Studies
Published on: May 9, 2019
The spatial-verbal difference in the n-back task: an ERP study
Yung-Nien Chen1, Suvobrata Mitra
1Department of Neurology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital-Kaohsiung Medical Center, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan. allen@ynchen.plus.com
Abstract:
The spatial-verbal dichotomy of working memory tasks was investigated using event-related potentials. Using an n-back task with three levels of n (0-, 1-, and 2-back), participants either matched words presented at a fixed screen position (verbal task) or matched the locations of non-word symbols presented at various positions across the screen (spatial task). Therefore, these two conditions were separated without confound of location and stimulus. Factors of match and task loading (Stimulus and N-Back effect) were found significant in P2a, N2 and P3, whereas domain-specific lateralization (Hemisphere x Task interaction, the feature of perception) was found significant in EPC, P2a and N2 but not in P3. These results hint time course of match (before P2a beginning, 200 ms) and perception (before P3 beginning, 300 ms).
More Related Videos
12:00Investigating the Effects of Antipsychotics and Schizotypy on the N400 Using Event-Related Potentials and Semantic Categorization
Published on: November 19, 2014
06:57Utilizing Electroencephalography Measurements for Comparison of Task-Specific Neural Efficiencies: Spatial Intelligence Tasks
Published on: August 9, 2016