Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Experiment Videos

Factors affecting accuracy and precision in PET volume imaging.

J S Karp1, M E Daube-Witherspoon, G Muehllehner

  • 1Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia 19104.

Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism : Official Journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism
|March 1, 1991
PubMed
Summary

Volume imaging positron emission tomographic (PET) scanners offer superior sensitivity and resolution compared to multiring scanners. This technology minimizes partial volume effects and requires 3D reconstruction for accurate imaging.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Characterization or Monolithic Scintillation Detectors Etched with Laser Induced Optical Barriers.

IEEE transactions on radiation and plasma medical sciences·2021
Same author

Impact of event positioning algorithm on performance of a whole-body PET scanner using one-to-one coupled detectors.

Physics in medicine and biology·2018
Same author

Abstracts of the 33rd International Austrian Winter Symposium : Zell am See, Austria. 24-27 January 2018.

EJNMMI research·2018
Same author

Recent developments in time-of-flight PET.

EJNMMI physics·2016
Same author

Impact of detector design on imaging performance of a long axial field-of-view, whole-body PET scanner.

Physics in medicine and biology·2015
Same author

DOI Determination by Rise Time Discrimination in Single-Ended Readout for TOF PET Imaging.

IEEE transactions on nuclear science·2014
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Area of Science:

  • Medical Imaging
  • Nuclear Medicine
  • Physics

Background:

  • Multiring PET scanners have limitations in sensitivity and axial sampling.
  • Partial volume effects can significantly alter measured concentrations in PET imaging.
  • Axial position affects concentration measurements in multiring scanners.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To highlight the advantages of volume imaging PET scanners.
  • To explain the benefits of high sensitivity and fine axial sampling.
  • To discuss the necessity of 3D reconstruction and good energy resolution.

Main Methods:

  • Comparison of volume imaging PET scanners with multiring PET scanners.
  • Analysis of sensitivity, axial sampling, and spatial resolution.
  • Evaluation of partial volume effect minimization.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Discussion of 3D reconstruction algorithms and energy resolution requirements.

    • Main Results:

    • Volume imaging PET scanners provide high sensitivity and fine axial sampling.
    • Fine axial sampling effectively minimizes the partial volume effect.
    • 3D reconstruction is essential for uniform axial resolution in volume imaging PET.
    • High energy resolution enables reduction of scattered radiation.

    Conclusions:

    • Volume imaging PET scanners offer significant improvements over multiring systems.
    • These scanners enhance quantitative accuracy by reducing partial volume effects.
    • Optimized reconstruction and energy resolution are critical for advanced PET imaging.