Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching III: Evaluation and Documentation

Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching III: Evaluation and Documentation

Evaluation of the teaching process enables the nurse to determine if the patient's learning needs were met and if training was effective. If the expected outcomes are not met, the care plan is revised, and additional education or reinforcement is provided. Nurses can ask questions after the session or obtain feedback to assess the patient's understanding of the topic.
Nurses can use several methods to evaluate patient outcomes. For example, oral questions can assess cognitive learning, patient...

Self-Evaluation Maintenance Model

Self-Evaluation Maintenance Model

The Self-Evaluation Maintenance (SEM) model offers a psychological framework to understand how individuals’ self-esteem is influenced by the achievements of others, particularly those with whom they share close personal bonds. The SEM model operates when personal rather than social identity guides individuals. Central to this model is the notion that individuals have an inherent desire to preserve a favorable self-image, which is continuously shaped by interpersonal comparisons and...

Sources of Self-Esteem II: Performance Feedback

Sources of Self-Esteem II: Performance Feedback

Self-esteem is intricately tied to our perception of competence and our ability to exert control over our lives. One of the primary sources of this perception is performance feedback — the ongoing evaluation of our actions in terms of success and failure. According to Franks and Marolla (1976), people derive self-worth from experiencing themselves as causal agents, capable of achieving goals and overcoming obstacles. This process nurtures a critical component of self-esteem: self-efficacy,...

Introspection

Introspection

Introspection, long upheld as a reliable route to self-knowledge, involves examining one's thoughts, emotions, and mental processes. It underpins many psychological practices, from mindfulness meditation to psychotherapy and self-help strategies. However, empirical evidence challenges the accuracy of introspection as a means of understanding oneself.Limitations of Introspective InsightSeminal work by Nisbett and Wilson demonstrated that individuals are frequently unaware of the true causes...

Negative and Positive Feedback

Negative and Positive Feedback

Animal organs and organ systems constantly adjust to internal and external changes through a process called homeostasis ("steady state"). Examples of these changes include regulation of the level of glucose or calcium in the blood or internal responses to external temperatures. Homeostasis requires maintaining an internal dynamic equilibrium:

Social Foundations of Self III: Self-Evaluation

Social Foundations of Self III: Self-Evaluation

Self-evaluation is the process by which individuals assess their abilities, behaviors, and characteristics based on feedback from others. Charles H. Cooley observed that a person’s self-perception is primarily influenced by how others see and judge them. He suggested that individuals form their identities based on their interpretations of others' reactions. As a result, social interactions play a crucial role in shaping self-esteem and personal identity. These external evaluations often blend...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Top five flashpoints in the assessment of teaching effectiveness.

Medical teacher·2012

Same author

Stomatitis-related pain in women with breast cancer undergoing autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant.

Cancer nursing·2008

Same author

Humor as an instructional defibrillator.

The Journal of health administration education·2008

Same author

Beyond student ratings: peer observation of classroom and clinical teaching.

International journal of nursing education scholarship·2006

Same author

The Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory: an evaluation of its reliability and validity for children with traumatic brain injury.

Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation·2005

Same author

Measuring the effectiveness of faculty mentoring relationships.

Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges·2004

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 17, 2026

Multimodal Protocol for Assessing Metacognition and Self-Regulation in Adults with Learning Difficulties

Multimodal Protocol for Assessing Metacognition and Self-Regulation in Adults with Learning Difficulties

Published on: September 27, 2020

Using the 360 degrees multisource feedback model to evaluate teaching and professionalism.

Ronald A Berk¹

¹The Johns Hopkins University, USA. rberk@son.jhmi.edu

Medical Teacher

|December 10, 2009

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

The 360 degrees multisource feedback (MSF) model offers a robust framework for evaluating medical school faculty teaching performance and professionalism. This approach provides more accurate and equitable assessments compared to relying solely on student ratings.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 17, 2026

Multimodal Protocol for Assessing Metacognition and Self-Regulation in Adults with Learning Difficulties

Multimodal Protocol for Assessing Metacognition and Self-Regulation in Adults with Learning Difficulties

Published on: September 27, 2020

Area of Science:

Medical Education
Academic Assessment
Faculty Development

Background:

Student ratings have been the sole metric for teaching performance for 50 years.
A growing trend seeks to enhance teaching evaluations with diverse data.
The 360 degrees multisource feedback (MSF) model, proven in industry and medicine, is a suitable candidate for faculty assessment.

Purpose of the Study:

To adapt the 360 degrees MSF model for evaluating medical school faculty teaching performance and professionalism.
To develop tailored MSF models for different assessment purposes.

Main Methods:

Extracted key characteristics of MSF models from industry and clinical medicine literature.
Integrated 14 evidence sources from eight rater types (students, self, peers, etc.) based on higher education research.
Adapted MSF models for both formative (improvement) and summative (merit) decisions.

Main Results:

Generated three distinct 360 degrees MSF models: for teaching improvement feedback, for merit/contract decisions, and for professional behavior assessment.
Detailed the specific characteristics of each model.
Identified ten persistent psychometric challenges for future research in implementing MSF.

Conclusions:

The 360 degrees MSF model provides a valuable framework for comprehensive faculty evaluation in medical schools.
This multisource approach enhances the accuracy, reliability, fairness, and equity of teaching performance and professionalism assessments compared to single-source methods.