Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 17, 2026

Determining the Likelihood of Variant Pathogenicity Using Amino Acid-level Signal-to-Noise Analysis of Genetic Variation
Published on: January 16, 2019
The continuing evolution of torsades de pointes liability testing methods: is there an end in sight?
Nathaniel Lee1, Simon Authier, Michael K Pugsley
1Cardiovascular Division School of Medicine Rayne Institute St Thomas' Hospital London SE17EH, UK. Nathaniel.Lee@kcl.ac.uk <Nathaniel.Lee@kcl.ac.uk>
Drug-induced torsades de pointes (TdP) is a dangerous heart arrhythmia. Current preclinical models lack validation, leading to stricter drug development guidelines and fewer new medicines. Improving integrated risk assessment can alleviate these regulatory barriers.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Pharmacology
- Drug Safety and Toxicology
- Electrophysiology
Background:
- Drug-induced torsades de pointes (TdP) is a potentially lethal cardiac arrhythmia linked to adverse drug reactions affecting heart repolarization.
- Existing preclinical models for predicting TdP liability lack validation, necessitating the use of surrogate biomarkers like QT interval duration.
- Regulatory guidelines mandate safety screening for new drugs, but the absence of definitive preclinical TdP models presents challenges.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the limitations of current preclinical models used for assessing drug-induced TdP liability.
- To propose improvements in the integrated risk assessment (IRA) approach to better predict TdP risk.
- To suggest alleviating regulatory barriers by enhancing the validation and deployment of existing and novel preclinical models.
Main Methods:
- Review of current regulatory guidelines (ICH S7A and S7B) for drug-induced TdP assessment.
- Analysis of commonly employed preclinical models, including hERG gene assays, canine ECGs, rabbit ventricular wedge preparations, Langendorff hearts, and Purkinje fibers.
- Discussion of the concept of TdP as a multicausal event and its implications for risk assessment.
Main Results:
- No single validated preclinical model exists with TdP incidence as a hard endpoint, leading to reliance on surrogate biomarkers and complementary assays.
- The integrated risk assessment (IRA) approach, ideally combining hERG assays and canine ECGs, is supplemented by in vitro assays, but validation remains limited.
- Strict regulatory guidelines, while reducing proarrhythmic compounds, have also led to a decrease in the number of new chemical entities (NCEs) pursued in development.
Conclusions:
- Drug-induced TdP is a complex, multicausal event, meaning a positive result in one model does not guarantee proarrhythmia.
- Current preclinical models for TdP risk assessment require further validation and acceptance to improve predictive accuracy.
- Enhancing the integrated risk assessment approach through better model validation and development is crucial for overcoming regulatory hurdles and facilitating drug development.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Therapeutic Drug Monitoring: Drug Analysis Methods
Antiarrhythmic Drugs: Class III Agents as Potassium Channel Blockers
Therapeutic Drug Monitoring: Overview and Classification
Pharmacovigilance
This process, termed pharmacovigilance, aims to detect, evaluate, and minimize harmful effects related to medication use. The data collection for pharmacovigilance depends on spontaneous reporting systems, where healthcare professionals or patients voluntarily report suspected ADRs.
In some cases, there...
Desensitization and Tachyphylaxis
Several...
Impact of Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Models: Regulatory Decisions

