Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 17, 2026

Roughness Impact of Piezoelectric Dental Scaler on Two Distinct Flowable Composite Filling Materials
Published on: January 10, 2025
Roughness of simulated surfaces examined with a haptic tool: effects of spatial period, friction, and resistance
Allan M Smith1, Georges Basile, Jonathan Theriault-Groom
1Département de Physiologie, Centre de Recherche en Sciences Neurologiques, Université de Montréal, C.P. 6128 Succursale Centre ville, Montreal, QC, H3C 3T8, Canada. allan.smith@umontreal.ca
Abstract:
A specifically designed force-feedback device accurately simulated textures consisting of lateral forces opposing motion, simulating friction. The textures were either periodic trapezoidal forces, or sinusoidal forces spaced at various intervals from 1.5 mm to 8.5 mm. In each of two experiments, 10 subjects interacted with the virtual surfaces using the index finger placed on a mobile plate that produced the forces. The subjects selected their own speed and contact force for exploring the test surface. The apparatus returned force fields as a function of both the finger position and the force normal to the skin allowing full control over the tangential interaction force. In Experiment #1, subjects used an integer, numerical scale of their own choosing to rate the roughness of eight identical, varyingly spaced force ramps superimposed on a background resistance. The results indicated that subjective roughness was significantly, but negatively, correlated (mean r = -0.84) with the spatial period of the resistances for all subjects. In a second experiment, subjects evaluated the roughness of 80 different sinusoidal modulated force fields, which included 4 levels of resistance amplitude, 4 levels of baseline friction, and 5 spatial periods. Multiple regression was used to determine the relationship between friction, tangential force amplitude, and spatial period to roughness. Together, friction and tangential force amplitude produced a combined correlation of 0.70 with subjective roughness. The addition of spatial period only increased the multiple regression correlation to 0.71. The correlation between roughness estimates and the rate of change in tangential force was 0.72 in Experiment #1 and 0.57 in Experiment #2. The results suggest that the sensation of roughness is strongly influenced by friction and tangential force amplitude, whereas the spatial period of simulated texture alone makes a negligible contribution to the sensation of roughness.
Related Concept Videos
Frictional Force
Characteristics of Dry Friction
Before the wheelbarrow starts moving, the static frictional force acts tangentially to the contact surface, opposing the force that is about to induce the motion. This frictional force prevents the...
Abrasion Resistance of Concrete
One such test is the revolving disc test, where three plates...
Static and Kinetic Frictional Force
However, if two systems are in contact and are stationary relative to one...
Types of Friction Problems
The first type of dry friction problem involves situations where there is no apparent impending motion.
Dry Friction
To illustrate this concept, imagine a wooden crate resting on a rough, non-uniform horizontal surface. When an external force is applied to...

