Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 17, 2026

Implantation of a New Micro Acoustic Tag in Juvenile Pacific Lamprey and American Eel
Published on: March 16, 2019
Oceanic, riverine, and genetic influences on spring chinook salmon migration timing
James J Anderson1, W Nicholas Beer
1School of Aquatic and Fishery Sciences, University of Washington, Box 358218, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA. jjand@u.washington.edu
Abstract:
Migrating salmonids often return to their spawning habitats in overlapping timing patterns of multiple stocks (populations) collectively called a run that varies in its genetic makeup across and within years. Managers, tasked with developing harvest strategies on these runs, may have preseason estimates of total run size but little information on run timing. Without both it is difficult to assess a run's status in real time. Consequently, to avoid overharvest, managers tend to control the timing of harvest. However, this strategy may inadvertently affect the component stocks disproportionately and therefore the run's diversity. Thus, accurate estimates of run timing are needed to improve management. We developed a model that includes genetic and environmental factors to predict the mean run timing of chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) at Bonneville Dam on the Columbia River, Oregon, USA. The model predicted mean runtiming (P < 0.00001, r2 = 0.78) by characterizing genetic run timing components from the arrival timing of precocious males returning one year prior to the remainder of the adults and environmental influences of oceanic and riverine flows that impede or advance the run timing. Variations in the relative abundances of the populations in the run explain 62% of the interannual variation in mean run timing while the oceanic and riverine factors combined account for 15.5%. We suggest that when genetic run timing characteristics are preserved in species with multiple maturation strategies the information can be used to improve run time predictions and maintain genetic diversity of harvested species.
Related Concept Videos
Gene Flow
Types of Selection
Genetics of Speciation
Osmoregulation in Fishes
Migration
Background and Environment Affect Phenotype
An example of how genetic background affects phenotype can be seen in horses. The Extension gene in horses is responsible for their coat color. A wild-type gene (EE) produces black pigment in the coat, while a mutant gene (ee) produces red pigment. A...

